General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow: Michelle succeeded with "what Ann Romney TRIED TO ACCOMPLISH in her speech..."
OH, that's gonna leave a MARK.
malaise
(269,334 posts)Amerigo Vespucci
(30,885 posts)calimary
(81,608 posts)No comparison. NONE.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)She came off like an animated mannequin only not as warm or human. It was one of the worst speeches I have ever heard. I took a couple minutes of it and fled for my own sanity.
upi402
(16,854 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)There, now will you gals vote for my husband? Am I done - can I leave now? All these little people make me want a shower.
garthranzz
(1,330 posts)Internet access?
Amerigo Vespucci
(30,885 posts)SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)And that has to hurt because often the truth does hurt.
Amerigo Vespucci
(30,885 posts)...was that the Republicans applauded attacks on Obama while the Democrats applauded the Democratic agenda.
As I said elsewhere, I watched the entire RNC. There was no enthusiasm for Romney directly. The only time he got a rise out of the crowd was when he attacked Obama.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)however, it will backfire on him because a lot of the undecided, middle of the road, (or as we call them low information voters) are not really mean people. It will eventually disgust them, especially if the media runs with it enough that they hear it over and over again, wherever there might be a TV on when they go about their business.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)It's the reaction of the people watching her speech on TV.
Sure a convention center filled with republicans are going to go bonkers for Marie Antoinette Wannabe, but I don't think of the home viewers especially democrats and independent voters, bought into her speech. Ann Romney is a woman of privileged who thinks people should just give her want she wants because she's wealthy.
Michelle never seemed like that ever. I Michelle's speech and I think she will impact home viewers!