Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLindsey Graham said a month ago there was no evidence of a quid pro quo. Now he's refusing to look
at the evidence that shows there was.https://www.businessinsider.com/lindsey-graham-refuses-look-sondland-testimony-quid-pro-quo-2019-11
GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham is refusing to look at new evidence of a quid pro quo involving President Donald Trump and military aid to Ukraine.
In September, Graham said evidence of Trump withholding military aid from Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden did "not exist."
A transcript of testimony from EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland, released by House committees on Tuesday, offers evidence of an explicit quid pro quo in this regard.
Graham on Tuesday told a reporter he wouldn't look at the new evidence and said the entire process surrounding the inquiry was "BS."
In September, Graham said evidence of Trump withholding military aid from Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden did "not exist."
A transcript of testimony from EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland, released by House committees on Tuesday, offers evidence of an explicit quid pro quo in this regard.
Graham on Tuesday told a reporter he wouldn't look at the new evidence and said the entire process surrounding the inquiry was "BS."
Lot of (R)epuglicons and trumpers with heads stuck in dark, moist, smelly places.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1251 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lindsey Graham said a month ago there was no evidence of a quid pro quo. Now he's refusing to look (Original Post)
erronis
Nov 2019
OP
He's known all along that 1) there was QPQ and 2) that the evidence would bear that out
Mr. Ected
Nov 2019
#1
Kind of tongue-in -cheek logic, to Lindsey's now refusing to look at the evidence
empedocles
Nov 2019
#2
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)1. He's known all along that 1) there was QPQ and 2) that the evidence would bear that out
It's called a cover-up and Lindsey is up to his beady little eyes in it.
I can't wait for the day that the evidence trail leads straight to Lindsey and Rand's back doors. They're both awash in Russian money and obstruction to protect their asses.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. Kind of tongue-in -cheek logic, to Lindsey's now refusing to look at the evidence
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)3. Someone on MSNBC said, "He will say anything at this point." and that feels right.
The Blue Flower
(5,420 posts)4. Let him keep his eyes closed
He won't see the blue wave coming for him.
Maeve
(42,224 posts)5. Don't confuse me with the facts! Shades of Watergate
Sancho
(9,065 posts)6. Leningrad Lindsey can't read!!
spanone
(135,635 posts)7. Lindsey threw his legacy or whatever he had down the toilet for don trump.
Baitball Blogger
(46,576 posts)8. That's called a wilful failure to know.