Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLaurence Tribe/Dahlia Lithwick: How Many Times Could Donald Trump Be Impeached?
How Many Times Could Donald Trump Be Impeached?
Laurence Tribe explains why Congress should aim to work at three speeds.
By Dahlia Lithwick
Oct 16, 2019
4:18 PM
On this weeks Amicus, Dahlia Lithwick spoke to Laurence Tribe, professor of constitutional law at Harvard, about some of the legal questions the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trumps behavior has brought up. A portion of that conversation, which has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity, is below.
snip//
Laurence Tribe: Well, a lot of people, I think, would have a lovely time imagining those perp walks, but I think thats not a realistic option. Its legal. Its a power that Congress has. It theoretically has the power. The Supreme Court has, without dissent, affirmed itthe power to actually conduct a little trial of people who refuse to comply with subpoenas and orders to show up and produce documents. And if they dont go along, they can be locked in the basement of the Capitol or they can be subjected to escalating fines.
But I think that would be a terrible distraction. Imagine in the modern world how that would look. It would really make the banana republic that the president has created look like sort of a banana soup republic. Its just not a good idea. Not that we cant do itand maybe hanging it over the White House as a kind of sword of Damocles is rhetorically a good ideabut its not something I favor.
I think it would be a distraction. I think one has to go to court, one has to expedite proceedings in court. And if courts move too slowly, just with what they sometimes call all deliberate speed, then dont wait. As Ive argued in various forums, theres no reason why impeachment cant proceed right now on the basis of what we know while we continue to investigate. It would be justifiable for the House of Representatives to impeach the president for various abuses of power, particularly with respect to the way he withheld military assistance from a vulnerable Ukraine in order to benefit his own reelection campaign by getting manufactured dirt on Joe Biden and in order to achieve other things. Thats an abuse of power. He could be impeached for that tomorrow.
He could also be impeached for this kind of stonewalling, the I spit on your Congress, tomorrow. Theres no reason why these impeachments cant proceed while Congress still digs around and tries to get to the bottom of certain details, which we neednt know in order to say that he has abused his power in an impeachable way, but which the nation has a right to know. The way in which there is a kind of private State Department run by Giuliani and some thugs who were recently arrested and how this all has gone on under our noses for the last several monthsall of that needs to be unearthed.
But he can be impeached in the meantime. And theres no rule that says you can only impeach a president once. The stone wall that he had relied on in the Senate is beginning to crack. Its not at all clear that the Senate will back him up. A lot of senators are so dismayed by the way he is throwing our allies, the Kurds, under the bus and virtually inviting ethnic cleansing. A lot of those people are beginning, I think, to reconsider whether they want to go down with this particular version of the Titanic.
So I actually said the same thing this past week, I think, in print: Dont turn this into two years of waiting for [special counsel Robert] Mueller. If Donald Trump confessed to Lester Holt that he fired Jim Comey to get rid of the Russia probe, we dont need two more years of evidence. And essentially weve got, as I understand it, the three articles of impeachment against Nixon: abuse of power, obstruction, ignoring subpoenas. Weve got that in our hands, and trying to run after emoluments, which weve been doing for three years with very middling success, is not the way to go. I think the people who resist the analysis you and I just put forward tend to say, Youre leaving too much on the table. You cannot leave on the table all the other bad conduct.
Theres no reason why these impeachments cant proceed while Congress still digs around and tries to get to the bottom of certain details. Laurence Tribe
But I dont want to leave it on the table. As Im saying, impeach the guy and keep pursuing him for all of these other things. I dont think that having voted an article of impeachment, you then fold up your briefcase and walk away. He should not be allowed to get away with any of these horrible things hes done. But that doesnt mean that because hes done so many abusive things, he can basically tie us up in knots and stay in power and take extremely dangerous steps that undermine our national security and erode our alliances, just because hes done so much thats wrong that we can never quite catch up. Its like saying not just I could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and get away with it. Its that every time you go after me for shooting someone on Fifth Avenue, Ill shoot somebody else and youll never catch up.
more...
Laurence Tribe: Well, a lot of people, I think, would have a lovely time imagining those perp walks, but I think thats not a realistic option. Its legal. Its a power that Congress has. It theoretically has the power. The Supreme Court has, without dissent, affirmed itthe power to actually conduct a little trial of people who refuse to comply with subpoenas and orders to show up and produce documents. And if they dont go along, they can be locked in the basement of the Capitol or they can be subjected to escalating fines.
But I think that would be a terrible distraction. Imagine in the modern world how that would look. It would really make the banana republic that the president has created look like sort of a banana soup republic. Its just not a good idea. Not that we cant do itand maybe hanging it over the White House as a kind of sword of Damocles is rhetorically a good ideabut its not something I favor.
I think it would be a distraction. I think one has to go to court, one has to expedite proceedings in court. And if courts move too slowly, just with what they sometimes call all deliberate speed, then dont wait. As Ive argued in various forums, theres no reason why impeachment cant proceed right now on the basis of what we know while we continue to investigate. It would be justifiable for the House of Representatives to impeach the president for various abuses of power, particularly with respect to the way he withheld military assistance from a vulnerable Ukraine in order to benefit his own reelection campaign by getting manufactured dirt on Joe Biden and in order to achieve other things. Thats an abuse of power. He could be impeached for that tomorrow.
He could also be impeached for this kind of stonewalling, the I spit on your Congress, tomorrow. Theres no reason why these impeachments cant proceed while Congress still digs around and tries to get to the bottom of certain details, which we neednt know in order to say that he has abused his power in an impeachable way, but which the nation has a right to know. The way in which there is a kind of private State Department run by Giuliani and some thugs who were recently arrested and how this all has gone on under our noses for the last several monthsall of that needs to be unearthed.
But he can be impeached in the meantime. And theres no rule that says you can only impeach a president once. The stone wall that he had relied on in the Senate is beginning to crack. Its not at all clear that the Senate will back him up. A lot of senators are so dismayed by the way he is throwing our allies, the Kurds, under the bus and virtually inviting ethnic cleansing. A lot of those people are beginning, I think, to reconsider whether they want to go down with this particular version of the Titanic.
So I actually said the same thing this past week, I think, in print: Dont turn this into two years of waiting for [special counsel Robert] Mueller. If Donald Trump confessed to Lester Holt that he fired Jim Comey to get rid of the Russia probe, we dont need two more years of evidence. And essentially weve got, as I understand it, the three articles of impeachment against Nixon: abuse of power, obstruction, ignoring subpoenas. Weve got that in our hands, and trying to run after emoluments, which weve been doing for three years with very middling success, is not the way to go. I think the people who resist the analysis you and I just put forward tend to say, Youre leaving too much on the table. You cannot leave on the table all the other bad conduct.
Theres no reason why these impeachments cant proceed while Congress still digs around and tries to get to the bottom of certain details. Laurence Tribe
But I dont want to leave it on the table. As Im saying, impeach the guy and keep pursuing him for all of these other things. I dont think that having voted an article of impeachment, you then fold up your briefcase and walk away. He should not be allowed to get away with any of these horrible things hes done. But that doesnt mean that because hes done so many abusive things, he can basically tie us up in knots and stay in power and take extremely dangerous steps that undermine our national security and erode our alliances, just because hes done so much thats wrong that we can never quite catch up. Its like saying not just I could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and get away with it. Its that every time you go after me for shooting someone on Fifth Avenue, Ill shoot somebody else and youll never catch up.
more...
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/impeach-trump-multiple-times-laurence-tribe.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 703 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Laurence Tribe/Dahlia Lithwick: How Many Times Could Donald Trump Be Impeached? (Original Post)
babylonsister
Oct 2019
OP
Exactly! If your s.o. has cheated a dozen times, dump them already! Don't wait for a complete count!
unblock
Oct 2019
#1
There are numerous ways the Speaker can play this, just as an example, a draft
empedocles
Oct 2019
#2
unblock
(52,206 posts)1. Exactly! If your s.o. has cheated a dozen times, dump them already! Don't wait for a complete count!
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. There are numerous ways the Speaker can play this, just as an example, a draft
circulation of an impeachment item could be circulated, [and probably leaked], for comment. Satisfying some do something now types perhaps.
Anyway, it seems that the Speaker's long game of letting the process and events [like Ukraine], play out, is working very well.
BigmanPigman
(51,590 posts)3. Good! I have asked if he could be impeached more than once on DU
over the past few weeks but no one knew the definite answer. Earlier this week I heard that YES, he could be from a different professional (not Tribe) on MSNBC. He will get nailed one way or another.