Would Greenland Be A Red Or Blue State?......

[global1]

Maybe if it would be a blue state - we should encourage Trump!!!!! (sarcasm)

[Act_of_Reparation]

1. The current premier is a Social Democrat

I'm guessing blue.

[hlthe2b]

2. Of course it would as ridiculous as the premise. Greenland is (and will continue to be) under Danish

control and Denmark, like all Scandinavian countries, are sane countries with the strongest social safety nets and other policies that put their people first and that the RW would disdain as "welfare" and "socialism".

[Clash City Rocker]

3. The population is 88% Inuit

One has to think they wouldn’t respond well to Trump’s racist dialogue.

[TreasonousBastard]

4. It might be neither. It is 88% native Inuit and they would have to be recognized as US...

citizens before they could vote. And even if they vote, they would not have a relevant Congressional delegation. Or an Electoral College vote.

Kinda like Guam.

Statehood would be a looong way off. First deal with Puerto Rico.

[CanonRay]

5. Why would anyone want to join this madhouse

Sane people here are looking for escape routes...

[Aristus]

6. Nobody lives there, so it would be a red state.

But it's cold, so it would be a blue state.

But it's rural, so it would be a red state.

But it's Danish, so it would be a blue state.

But it's......

[maveric]

7. White

[lame54]

8. They wouldn't be green with envy that's for sure...

They would be red with embarrassment

And blue with depression

[Vogon_Glory]

9. I suspect that the Repuds who want the US to acquire Greenland are about as numerous as

The Argentines willing to pick up and move to the Falklands if the Brits handed it over to their country.