HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » A Modest Proposal: Can We...

Sat May 18, 2019, 09:19 PM

A Modest Proposal: Can We Compromise With the Forced-Birthers?

Hear (well, read) me out, now... I know how dizzyingly rageful the latest round of forced-birth legislation has made everyone who mistakes women for human beings. And when the rage is that overwhelming, the very word "compromise" can be like a red flag before a bull. I get that.

But look at the playing field, particularly the Supreme Court. Not to mention all those other Federal Courts the forced-birthers are busily packing. We're in a real pickle, here.

Maybe it's time to negotiate.

I had an idea that will reduce the number of forced births women are subjected to by up to FIFTY PERCENT.

Yes, yes, I know... NO forced births is the morally, ethically, and humanly correct number, but we're a very long way from that now.

Fortunately, technology has stepped in with a potential partial solution (no, I didn't say "partial birth", put away that brick of C-4, dudes.)

See, now with modern medicine, we can tell the gender of a fetus at about nine to ten weeks with a simple NIPT screen. A few more weeks, and we can use ultrasound as well. This is critical, because it enables us to identify the VALUABLE fetuses. The ones who are fully human and can be accorded full rights as human when they're born.

Thus, we can also identify the second-class fetuses, the ones that are not quite fully human and thus can be legally treated like an advanced form of livestock.

So how about this: We allow the uterine hosts to abort ONLY THE LESS VALUABLE fetuses, and force them to carry only the valuable ones to term?

This will reduce the number of forced births by, well, maybe not a full fifty percent, since some uterine hosts may decide to go ahead and replicate another uterine host, but it will drastically cut down on the total number of forced births.

We only send them to jail for 99 years or whatever, if we find they've accidentally-or-on-purpose aborted one of those valuable, fully human fetuses.

We cool with this? I think it could work...

experimentally,
Bright

P.S. I suppose I should add the smiley here... there's always someone who needs it.

3 replies, 740 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply A Modest Proposal: Can We Compromise With the Forced-Birthers? (Original post)
TygrBright May 2019 OP
Phoenix61 May 2019 #1
msongs May 2019 #2
hunter May 2019 #3

Response to TygrBright (Original post)

Sat May 18, 2019, 09:27 PM

1. Excellent idea!

Way to go thinking out of the box.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TygrBright (Original post)

Sat May 18, 2019, 09:38 PM

2. yes indeed. women choose what's best for themselves. great compromise nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TygrBright (Original post)

Sat May 18, 2019, 10:05 PM

3. Personally, I think all anti-abortionist men should be castrated.

Uterus transplants are now possible.

Anti-abortionist men can birth those embryos that would otherwise be aborted and and breastfeed them for a year or too as well.

Modern medical technology can make them actual mothers thus addressing all their ethical concerns.








Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread