General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats say $2 trillion for infrastructure agreed to after meeting with Trump
BWahahahahahaaa you know trump will say he never agreed.
There is still no guarantee a plan that both sides agree to will ultimately come together and so far it appears that many details of a potential plan -- including how to pay for it -- have not yet been worked out, but congressional Democratic leaders emerged from the meeting on Tuesday signaling optimism and describing it as a first step toward finding common ground, which has proven elusive between the President and congressional Democrats, many of whom are investigating his administration.
"It was a very constructive meeting," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said after the meeting. "We agreed on a number, which was very, very, good, $2 trillion for infrastructure. Originally, we had started a little lower and even the President was eager to push it up to $2 trillion. That is a very good thing."
Referring to the question of how to pay for any plan, which could become the key sticking point in negotiations, Schumer added, "We told the President that we needed his ideas on funding ... Where does he propose that we can fund this? Because certainly in the Senate, if we don't have him on board it would be very hard to get the Senate to go along. We said we would meet in three weeks and he would present to us some of his ideas on funding. So this was a very, very good start and we hope it will go to a constructive conclusion."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/30/politics/pelosi-schumer-trump-infrastructure-meeting/index.html
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)As soon as his taxophobic base gets done telling him what to think via Fox, Trump will be out denying that any deal was reached or that any numbers were talked about. I don't think that will play very well with 75-80% of the voters.
watoos
(7,142 posts)Dumbest thing Democrats ever did.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)The GOP will refuse.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)And he has ways of corrupting that money into his pockets by forcing contributions into his PAC, and doing like he's done before.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Democrats - no new taxes on the middle class and no cuts to social programs, education, healthcare.
Corporations and 1-2%er pay equal share of taxes and overhaul that gawd awful GOP tax scam for starters.
Now, what say you McTurtle and your fucked up party.,
andym
(5,447 posts)Too much ideological purity from the Republicans about never raising taxes will doom this.
louis-t
(23,314 posts)Putin or the Chinese?
11 Bravo
(23,928 posts)with the one-ply toilet paper you find therein.
The used tissue will be worth infinitely more than any Trump promise.
Wounded Bear
(58,792 posts)Repubs will want to finance by selling everything off to private entities and charging tolls and fees.
Trump will want to put up "Trump Memorial Bridge/Highway" signs and basically do the absolute minimum to actually improve anything.
Dems will want to spend tax dollars and have the results be free to use by all.
Hopeful sounding that they might repair some bridges and roads, but color me skeptical.
spanone
(135,950 posts)kurtcagle
(1,606 posts)Pelosi has indicated before that she wants to get infrastructure funded, knows (as does Schumer) that McTurtle isn't about to let it get through the Senate, but it now puts infrastructure on Trump's plate as having committed to it. Trump will push for his damn wall, Dems will give him token funds for studies, and the Senate kills it, or the Democrats get a bipartisan bill through Congress and Trump has to eat his own words.
Trump being bipartisan is NOT a good thing to his follower's eyes, who believe Democrats are the Devil incarnate and should never be negotiated with.
As far as I can tell, there's no real downside to the strategy. Best case scenario, we get a decent infrastructure funding bill out of it and a nice story about how Democrats are open to compromise for the right goals for the Independents and a poke in the eye of the RWers. Worst case scenario, we put the GOP against Trump in what should be a routine matter.