Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
Wed Apr 24, 2019, 04:01 AM Apr 2019

Trump administration insists UN resolution opposing rape in war cannot offer 'sexual and....

.....reproductive health' assistance to victims

The UN Security Council passed a resolution that seeks action against rape as a weapon of war, after impassioned pleas by activists including Amal Clooney.

The resolution, sponsored by Germany, only received a green light after sections that vowed to offer “sexual and reproductive health” assistance to survivors of sexual violence, were removed at the insistence of the US, which had otherwise threatened to veto it entirely.

In language that was notably stern about one of its allies, France’s UN ambassador, Francois Delattre, told the 15-member body it was inexplicable that an undertaking to provide such help had been removed.

“It is intolerable and incomprehensible that the Security Council is incapable of acknowledging that women and girls who suffered from sexual violence in conflict – and who obviously didn’t choose to become pregnant – should have the right to terminate their pregnancy,” he said.


[link:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/war-rape-trump-us-un-resolution-reproductive-health-amal-clooney-germany-a8883436.html|

I honestly think the UN should have told the US to fuck off on this one. The US spreading theocracy one resolution at a time. Especially classy when they use rape victims to spread their bollocks
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump administration insists UN resolution opposing rape in war cannot offer 'sexual and.... (Original Post) Soph0571 Apr 2019 OP
ugh. blue wave 2020 Demovictory9 Apr 2019 #1
As a permanent member of the Security Council the US gets a veto Spider Jerusalem Apr 2019 #2
Yeah - because God forbid a raped woman gets pregnant & a sexually transmitted disease and wants to Pachamama Apr 2019 #3
If a raped victim gets pregnant... forgotmylogin Apr 2019 #7
Trump considers his fundie base in every decision he makes. LuvNewcastle Apr 2019 #4
chria law. so much for the contitution + founders. pansypoo53219 Apr 2019 #5
Apparently it's not enough for them to just control American uteri. Vinca Apr 2019 #6
I hate him. nt Lucky Luciano Apr 2019 #8
Objective: SLAVERY for US & World females CousinIT Apr 2019 #9
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
2. As a permanent member of the Security Council the US gets a veto
Wed Apr 24, 2019, 04:59 AM
Apr 2019

so unfortunately they couldn't just say "no, fuck off".

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
3. Yeah - because God forbid a raped woman gets pregnant & a sexually transmitted disease and wants to
Wed Apr 24, 2019, 05:04 AM
Apr 2019

.....have medical attention....

Or a man is raped anally and torn and needs medical attention.

Or a child is raped and their internal organs so badly damaged and injured...

Yeah - God forbid that the rape victims get sexual and reproductive medical attention...

Disgusting

forgotmylogin

(7,527 posts)
7. If a raped victim gets pregnant...
Wed Apr 24, 2019, 05:44 AM
Apr 2019

Do they really want to go the "It was God's will that this child is born through a war-crime" route?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump administration insi...