General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe scientific maneuver Mueller used that implicates Trump
If you are a fan of movies or stories where a clever protagonist uses cunning strategy or the tools of science to outmaneuver an opponent, then youre going to love Volume 2 of the Mueller report. Special counsel Robert Mueller released his report Thursday in two volumes. Volume 1 is all about the connections between the Trump campaign and Russian agents, businesses, or government actors. Volume 2 is all about the possibility that President Trump engaged in the criminal act of obstruction of justice during the investigation about his campaign.
The maneuver that Mueller uses in Volume 2 is extraordinary. Its a social scientists delight and should be used as a case example in research methods classes. Special counsel Mueller uses the logic and procedure of the scientific method to arrive at his conclusion in his investigation about the possibility of obstruction of justice. This is unusual because it is not the typical route that an attorney would use in building a case or preparing an investigatory report. In short, rather than providing evidence to support a claim of obstruction, Mueller essentially sets out to falsify a null hypothesis that obstruction did not occur.
The double-negative language that describes this procedure can be confusing. Heres how it works. The scientific method that all scientists, natural or social, use involves a process called falsification. The method was popularized by a philosopher named Karl Popper, who in the mid 20th century wrote a book called The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Popper argues that in science it is not possible to prove anything; rather, scientists seek to theorize all the possible explanations for a phenomenon, and then seek evidence to disprove as many of those explanations as possible.
Its a process of elimination. And this is exactly what Mueller does in his report. Mueller does not set out to prove that the president engaged in obstruction of justice; rather, Mueller recognizes that he is bound by the Attorney Generals interpretation of the law, which says the sitting president cannot be charged with a crime. In light of this legal interpretation, it would be futile for Mueller to build a case and demonstrate that the president should be charged with the crime of obstruction. So Mueller does something incredibly clever: He falsifies all of the alternative explanations.
-more-
https://www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2019/4/22/18510837/mueller-report-president-trump?fbclid=IwAR3ho317D1A7sCaHhqIISJE0GNXKr4RC09UeHFhdmVsYOf-7tM6PqjzV_QA
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)much moreso than tRump!
WheelWalker
(8,955 posts)dem4decades
(11,288 posts)That would have made life easier.