Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

PeeJ52

(1,588 posts)
Thu Apr 11, 2019, 10:28 PM Apr 2019

I just saw the bit on Rachel about Don Jr. and his communication with WikiLeaks...

that is documented by Mueller. How can they say there was no collusion by the tRump campaign, when they have the messages between the Russians, WikiLeaks, Don Jr., and his public tweets doing what WikiLeaks told him to do? Barr says he could find no collusion? The GRU must not be the "Russian Government". That must be his out, I'm guessing. That sure seemed damning to me. Unless Don Jr. wasn't a part of the campaign. Maybe pResident tRump doesn't know who he is too...

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I just saw the bit on Rachel about Don Jr. and his communication with WikiLeaks... (Original Post) PeeJ52 Apr 2019 OP
It beats the fuck outta me. UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #1
Pee, whenever I see a mention of jr., I like to mention this tidbit: Leghorn21 Apr 2019 #2
People are way over-blowing Barr's "no collusion/conspiracy" in exactly the way Barr intended... RockRaven Apr 2019 #3

Leghorn21

(13,527 posts)
2. Pee, whenever I see a mention of jr., I like to mention this tidbit:
Thu Apr 11, 2019, 10:39 PM
Apr 2019
Spanish prosecutor Jose Grinda said Don Jr should be "very concerned" about wiretaps of his meetings w Putin crony Alexander Torshin (also NRA's contact in Russia). Grinda turned those wiretaps over to FBI.

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-jr-should-be-concerned-over-putin-allys-wiretapped-calls-spanish-945753

So we got that goin for us as well, dammit

Hang tough, my friend

RockRaven

(15,097 posts)
3. People are way over-blowing Barr's "no collusion/conspiracy" in exactly the way Barr intended...
Thu Apr 11, 2019, 10:50 PM
Apr 2019

He's been a lawyer for 40+ years, he knew exactly what he was doing. And corporate media unthinkingly, or maliciously, ran with it.

Barr said that Trump(1) did not conspire(2) in advance(3) on two specific crimes(4) committed by Russians.

(1) What about people close to him, including ones with poorly defined relationships?
(2) This depends on an application of Barr's interpretation of the legal definition of conspiracy
(3) What about being an accessory after the fact, or knowing in advance but not acting in furtherance in advance?
(4) What about everything other than these two specific crimes?


Barr is a goddamned weasel. Like a lot of lawyers, he can lie to your face in spirit while technically making correct statements -- and that implies maybe he was not out-right lying, which is a presumption I will never grant a person who *accepts* a job from Trump, never mind a sh*t-smear like Barr who LOBBIED for a job from Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I just saw the bit on Rac...