Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 09:34 AM Apr 2019

Congress' new Mueller fight: Do Dems need to begin impeachment to see secret files?


By KYLE CHENEY 04/06/2019 08:43 AM EDT

Do Democrats have to begin the process of impeaching President Donald Trump in order to access special counsel Robert Mueller’s secrets?

That legal debate began raging inside the House Judiciary Committee on Friday after a new federal court ruling suggested that Congress’ access to some confidential evidence — like the kind obtained by Mueller — hinges on lawmakers launching a “judicial proceeding.”

Republicans on the committee say the only “judicial proceeding” Congress can lead is an impeachment inquiry -- a claim they say is backed up by legal precedent and history. Democrats would have to launch one against Trump if they want Mueller’s grand jury evidence, Republicans say.

That interpretation would be problematic for Democratic leaders in Congress, who have little interest in launching a politically explosive impeachment process at the moment. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has said it’s not worth the House’s time and other top Democrats have said it’s premature while they conduct their own investigations and await the details of Mueller’s findings.

But it’s a fight that could animate the next few weeks and months as Democrats attempt to pry loose as much information from Mueller’s probe as they can. They’re still awaiting access to a redacted version of Mueller’s 400-page report, which Attorney General William Barr has indicated he’ll deliver by mid-April. But Democrats say Congress must see an unredacted version of the report and Mueller’s underlying evidence -- even if Barr has to get a judge to unseal the grand jury material it contains.

more
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/06/mueller-impeachment-democrats-1259917
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
1. I had wondered that. Time to start impeachment proceedings!
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 09:40 AM
Apr 2019

We can just say Republicans forced us to do it.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,121 posts)
2. YESSSSS!! Impeachment hearings should be started IMMEDIATELY!!
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 09:44 AM
Apr 2019

Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

greymattermom

(5,751 posts)
3. So they need to have the hearings to decide whether or not to bring impeachment charges.
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 09:52 AM
Apr 2019

What's wrong with that? They will vote on impeachment AFTER they see the evidence, right?

Fiendish Thingy

(15,551 posts)
4. Impeachment is the one congressional duty with established legal precedent to get GJ material
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 10:24 AM
Apr 2019

Courts have ruled in the Watergate case that congress could have access to grand jury evidence, (aka Rule 6e), that is otherwise not allowed, in order to carry out the duty of impeachment.

What isn't clear to me is does congress have to convene formal impeachment hearings, or can Nadler simply state the Judiciary committee is initiating an "investigation" related to their impeachment powers?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congress' new Mueller fig...