Does anyone else think Barr put an end to the investigation?

[onecaliberal]

Watching seasoned prosecutors with puzzling question about why there were not some conclusions drawn after two years. Maybe it’s just me?

[Terminally_Chill]

1. yes

[Delmette2.0]

2. Yes

[Jarqui]

3. Yes

[uponit7771]

4. Yes and Barr is not obligated to tell congress any of that

[Lindsay]

5. It would not surprise me.

Barr was not hired for his integrity.

[onecaliberal]

6. Barr never had integrity.

[RKP5637]

7. To me, the whole thing smells bad. WTF was Mueller doing if no conclusion was drawn. I would

think that would be the key to the entire affair with no loose ends. Seems like a lot has been left open to interpretation by the AG. I'm no expert ... I just find it all a bit weird ... far too opened ended. And what about all of the lies and cover ups ... just a total WTF to me.

[onecaliberal]

9. I don't think mueller was permitted to draw conclusions.

[Hoyt]

8. If Barr told Mueller to wrap it up without implicating trump too much, Mueller should have called a

press conference. I get that is easy for me to say, but if Mueller was really the hero and unbiased investigator we've believed for 2 years, he would have done just that.

[onecaliberal]

11. Hear, hear.

[budkin]

10. Absolutely

It's why he was hired.

[Arazi]

12. Yes. That was obviously why he was selected to be AG

[BigmanPigman]

13. Yes, I wrote that yesterday.

A two year investigation is closed after Barr has been AG for only 5 weeks!

[ForgedCrank]

14. it did put an end to "A" investigation. But I've a feeling there is plenty more

unrelated on the way.
Even being completely in the dark for 2 years, it is obvious this extended beyond his campaign.

[JDC]

15. Yes

[MFM008]

16. yes

that's why maggot put him in there.