Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom Virginia Heffernan contributing editor @WIRED / columnist @latimesopinion / tv @MSNBC
Virginia Heffernan Verified account
@page88 contributing editor @WIRED / columnist @latimesopinion / host @realTrumpcast / tv @MSNBC /
@page88 contributing editor @WIRED / columnist @latimesopinion / host @realTrumpcast / tv @MSNBC /
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 1585 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From Virginia Heffernan contributing editor @WIRED / columnist @latimesopinion / tv @MSNBC (Original Post)
MelissaB
Mar 2019
OP
+1, I'm discounting the 'no further indictments' seeing no one is naming an "OFFICIAL" source
uponit7771
Mar 2019
#4
manor321
(3,344 posts)1. I saw that but I'm discounting all rumors like that for my own sanity
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)2. Probably a good idea. However she did say source was reliable.
It's still a waiting game...
uponit7771
(90,329 posts)4. +1, I'm discounting the 'no further indictments' seeing no one is naming an "OFFICIAL" source
elleng
(130,834 posts)5. I have little doubt it's bad for him.
I don't understand why smart people would complain 'no indictment,' considering DoJ policy and Mueller's inclination to follow the rules and policy closely. That was a given for me.
uponit7771
(90,329 posts)8. +1, .. and I've got no answer on the official who made the statement from my OP question. It looks
... like No Indictments was stoke of the DOJ and the DOJ didn't take the bait
madville
(7,408 posts)6. And just yesterday she was blaming Bill Clinton for decades of sex crimes
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)7. Confirmation?
BREAKING on @MSNBC: Pete Williams reports that AG
Bill Barr will deliver his report to Congress in the next
30-45 minutes, according to a DOJ official.
Bill Barr will deliver his report to Congress in the next
30-45 minutes, according to a DOJ official.
Link to tweet
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)9. Fuck this shit
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)10. Evidently an update:
Barrs imminent summary of principal conclusions may be very abridged and expurgated. Should not be considered the damaging document that my source says the Mueller report is. Might have to wait for a subpoena from Schiff to see the real thing.
Link to tweet
onenote
(42,675 posts)11. Smells like bullshit.
Everyone and their cousin claims to have "good sources." In reality it's almost certain none of them do.
Ms. Toad
(34,056 posts)12. This aged well . . .
I'm sure there's bad things in there - but it apparently was not as bad as Heffernan's source suggested.
Azathoth
(4,607 posts)13. "Damaging" means nothing. Trump's party doesn't care what he's done
so the normal rules of political damage don't apply.
No one is getting charged, so unless Dems grow a spine and impeach, it won't matter if the report proves that Trump is the love child of Hitler and Pol Pot.