Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts)
Wed Oct 31, 2018, 10:08 AM Oct 2018

Sarah 3 Name says unnamed 'legal scholars' gave Trump permission to subvert the Constitution



Sarah Sanders says unnamed ‘legal scholars’ gave Trump permission to subvert the Constitution on citizenship


David Edwards
31 Oct 2018 at 09:22 ET


White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders on Wednesday insisted that “legal scholars” have given President Donald Trump the green light to end birthright citizenship even though it’s a right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

During an interview on Fox & Friends, host Brian Kilmeade pointed out to Sanders that many critics of Trump see the move as a “xenophobic, racist quest to change America.”

“I’m not at all surprised that the media and Democrats, which sometimes can be one in the same, would overplay their hand in the way that they’re doing,” Sanders replied. “The reason we’re in this predicament is because Democrats in Congress have failed to do their job. And the president is going to look at any way possible that he can find legally and constitutionally to make sure that we’re doing everything we can.”

“Can he used an executive order or does he have to go through Congress?” co-host Ainsley Earhardt wondered.

“There are a number of legal scholars who certainly think he can,” Sanders insisted. “Again, the president is going to take whatever powers he has to protect our borders and to protect our country.


https://www.rawstory.com/2018/10/sarah-sanders-says-unnamed-legal-scholars-gave-trump-permission-subvert-constitution-citizenship/
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sarah 3 Name says unnamed 'legal scholars' gave Trump permission to subvert the Constitution (Original Post) jodymarie aimee Oct 2018 OP
Stephen Miller is NOT a legal scholar janterry Oct 2018 #1
Dewey,Chatham, & Howe or Bob Loblaw? underpants Oct 2018 #2
Damn, beat me to it. haele Oct 2018 #4
Sarah Slanders peekaloo Oct 2018 #3
An Executive Order can be overturned kskiska Oct 2018 #5
Who? Slippin' Jimmy McGill? The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #6
Some people (who happen to be legal scholars) agree... Wounded Bear Oct 2018 #7
Those "scholars" were just in court this morning. Dread Pirate Roberts Oct 2018 #8
Such nonsense. madaboutharry Oct 2018 #9
PUtin is also not an American Constitutional scholar. lark Oct 2018 #10
oh gaud, onethatcares Oct 2018 #11
So now Executive Orders are okay? gratuitous Oct 2018 #12

haele

(12,640 posts)
4. Damn, beat me to it.
Wed Oct 31, 2018, 10:15 AM
Oct 2018

Y'know, I can be an anonymous legal scholar. I took two paralegal courses and know how to Google and use FindLaw...

Haele

peekaloo

(22,977 posts)
3. Sarah Slanders
Wed Oct 31, 2018, 10:15 AM
Oct 2018

When she speaks it like's a snake unhinging his jaw to swallow its prey. Considering what she swallows her digestive system must be a frightening scene.

madaboutharry

(40,190 posts)
9. Such nonsense.
Wed Oct 31, 2018, 10:36 AM
Oct 2018

There are no "legal scholars" giving him this advice. No doubt his buddy Alan Dershowitz would even scoff at the whole stupid assertion.

Oh, and last time I looked the republicans have had complete control of both houses of Congress for the last several years and have had the presidency for the last two. Democrats are sidelined and powerless to stop the republicans from doing whatever they want.

I am hoping against hope that next Tuesday is a really bad day for this WH.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
12. So now Executive Orders are okay?
Wed Oct 31, 2018, 11:27 AM
Oct 2018

Remember when Obama used Executive Orders to carry out legal functions that the government had committed itself to because Republicans refused to do a goddam thing? Oh, it was the end of the Republic! Now, Trump can't get jack shit done even with a friendly Congress, so it's time to shit-can the Constitution.

"What are 'obvious conclusions from Sanders' remarks that the media won't dare to draw'?"

Correct, gratuitous. You have control of the board.

"Let's finish Trumpian Numbskullery for two thousand, Alex."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sarah 3 Name says unnamed...