General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNancy pelosi took impeachment "off the table" can we trust her with the impeachment of trump
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)Freestate_MD
(69 posts)Indeed not.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)former9thward
(31,974 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)So i dont understand why it cant be discussed. It isnt going to hurt anything. surely we can walk and chew gum.
Meadowoak
(5,545 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)this is clearly against the DU rules. Perhaps Red State would be more suitable to your POV. imo
Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)Who leads the house
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)And in Janaury if the odds are really in the Democrats favor.
BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)Pelosi has taken far, far, far too much abuse from DEMOCRATS. We would never have had the Affordable Care Act had she not been Speaker of the House. IF she said something was "not on the table"regarding impeachment, it was for purely strategic reasons. She loathes Pussy Grabber as much as anybody. To state otherwise is disingenuous.
brooklynite
(94,499 posts)3Hotdogs
(12,370 posts)An impeachment hearing for Bush would have brought out the dirty laundry of the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Firth cabal. There wouldn't have been a conviction but everyone would have known what shits they are.
Same with the Orange Shit-stain (Thanks Ferret). The information gathered by Muller may never see the light of day if Rosenstein is fired, followed by Muller. An impeachment hearing may be the only way we will know the extent of the treachery.
brooklynite
(94,499 posts)It's a process to remove the President, and the stakes are so high that you don't start if you're not prepared to successfully finish. If you FAIL to vote to impeach or FAIL to vote to convict (2/3 of Senate required) you have effectively acquitted him.
3Hotdogs
(12,370 posts)So what happened? Bush got to serve out his full term.
There also is no guarantee that an impeachment hearing for Trump would not gather enough shit that even Republicans would have to vote to convict.
JHan
(10,173 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)lovemydogs
(575 posts)Again, the democrats must be nice. Must not fight. Must not be tough.
Must shake and quiver.
Must always go high and never kick sand back in the bully's face.
emulatorloo
(44,113 posts)Steven Maurer
(459 posts)Impeaching someone who will never be convicted only gives the public sympathy for the one impeached.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)JUST FUCKING STOP IT.
dlk
(11,548 posts)Frankly, I would rather see Trump behind bars than impeached.
lordbateman
(18 posts)Just what we need now. Pelosi bashing.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)It makes me SICK but I am a liberal.
gopiscrap
(23,756 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)I do think that she believes correctly that if we talk about impeachment before the elections in November it will make his supporters come out in droves.
There really isnt any reason for his low information base to bother voting in the midterms. As far as theyre concerned hes ensconced solidly for two more years. Thats the reason so few people vote in the midterms. Theyre total lack of knowledge and political interest makes them complacent. His rallies arent helping him as much as we fear. But if we are seen as a real threat to his Presidency they will come out to defend him.
Pelosi is right about that. But my fear is that she will take it off the table.
My belief is that if Trump isnt the poster child for impeaching a President than no one is. Sooner or later in this country we have to do the right thing for the principles it is built on.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I get it-- with all of today's news, I'd throw something... hell, anything at the wall just on the hope it sticks.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)The votes weren't there for bush and they aren't there for tRump even if we take both houses.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)What with the Rosenstein issue, who knows.
But of course, the Mueller report results could reveal "high crimes and misdemeanors" (actually, such have been shown to date, without the Mueller report, IMO).
But first...let's take back Congress! Then we'll talk!
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)the repubs will bow to him and their base no matter the immorality or criminal behavior.
tRump will not be impeached and there will be no 25th amendment remedy. He will serve out his term. That's my prediction.
Now, a second term isn't likely to happen, IMO.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I think the Democratic leaders do not have the stomach or will to proceed with impeachment, even if warranted. It's stressful and takes time. They'll use the old "we have to press forward with our agenda" excuse.
The same reason(s) they used not to hold the criminal bankers accountable for torpedoing the economy in 2007. So....fast forward...and the bankers/investment cos. are doing it again. They know they will not be held accountable.
If Trump is not held accountable, there WILL be another Trump.
emulatorloo
(44,113 posts)lame54
(35,284 posts)Do a head count
No candidate should run on it
Gothmog
(145,126 posts)msongs
(67,394 posts)Hekate
(90,642 posts)I know it is reall really really really really hard for some people to get that fact through their heads.
Nonetheless, Nancy Pelosi is the single most accomplished Speaker of the House in US History. And as Minority Leader, she has held the line in vote after vote after vote, keeping the Democratic caucus in line.
But hey, whatever floats your boat.
malaise
(268,913 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,951 posts)
impeachment isn't even "on the table" - yet. Wait until an investigation concludes.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Step up and claim your prize.
Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)I dont want ms pelosi out of the house .
still_one
(92,130 posts)progressives decided not to vote for the Democratic nominee in 2016 by either voting third party or not voting?
and because some of the 47% who didnt dont vote thats were part of that, every Democrat running for Senate in those critical swing states lost to the establishment, Republican, incumbent, and those Democrats were progressive by any standard
A better question is can we trust those people to vote in the midterms sterns?
lark
(23,091 posts)One was a president out of office, the other is a sitting so-called president who is conspired with PUtin to steal the office and who is profiting personally from illegal foreign and who is attempting to change he world for the betterment of Russia and not the US. He is a present danger and she will 100% address it given proof of his crimes.
Obama took impeachment of Bush off the table before she did, she followed her president.
I wish people on this board would stop with the Pelosi bashing. She's a very effective Dem and we need everyone on board, not some moderate who will splinter the party trying to suck up to Repugs.
brush
(53,764 posts)the Kavanaugh debacle.