General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcConnell cut a deal w/ Senate Dems to fast track 7 Trump judges
Last edited Tue Aug 28, 2018, 06:14 PM - Edit history (2)
Link to tweet
McConnell says hes negotiating with Schumer on a package of judges they can agree to fast-track to a vote.
Link to tweet
And here it is: Senate just cut a deal to fast-track votes starting at 3:45p today on 11 nominationsincluding SEVEN Trump nominees to be district court judges.
Why would we do this? What did we get in return? This is all I've heard at this point.
I found out more on this . 2 of the judges, Baxter and Horan are Obama nominees.
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)onecaliberal
(32,846 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)And assuming this is true...have not seen it anywhere.
bluestarone
(16,925 posts)My thoughts are we SHOULDN'T BE FAST TRACKING A GOD-DAM THING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)enough
(13,257 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)...you do understand they are STACKING the Courts with right-wing, Federalist Society judges at a record-breaking pace, right?
Thrill
(19,178 posts)No
msongs
(67,400 posts)Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)And, I've never liked Schumer. Too bad he'll be there if the Dems gain control of the House. I'm more scared of what HE may do say than I am of thuglicans being in the minority in the house.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)republicans do what they ALWAYS do and simply refuse to follow through on theirs, and then we just whine about how we thought they were going to be honest brokers.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)Seven Trump district court judges in exchange for Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court.
OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Pearce, will get to stay and a couple of the 11 judges , Baxter and Horan are Obama nominees. So we got NLRB and 2 judges. Just found out Pearce wasn't confirmed, so that's out. There was an article in Bloomberg that Schumer and McConnell had made a deal on this.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)I mean. Normally it would take them into 2019 to confirm 15 judges.
Link to tweet
Senate agrees unanimously to vote on seven district court nominees this afternoon, followed by eight judicial nominations next week
BumRushDaShow
(128,901 posts)but just note that although it sounds like they are ramming through millions of judges and Obama did nothing, this is not the case.
Just as a comparison - from an article in 2014 during his 2nd term -
Finally, after years of threatening, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) went on the Senate floor in November 2013 and invoked the nuclear option, changing the Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for executive branch and judicial nominees (other than those for the Supreme Court).
A year later, the effect of that change is clear: The 113th Congress confirmed 132 district and circuit court judges, including 89 this year. Thats the highest single-year total in 20 years, and the highest two-year total since 1980. (Thats particularly impressive considering that this Congress was one of the least productive in history.) On Tuesday night alone, the Senate confirmed 12 nominees. All this means that the once-lagging Obama has now appointed more judges in his first six years (305) than Reagan, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush. And because Obama has gone out of his way to nominate judges from a wide array of backgrounds, the federal bench is more diverse than ever. All in all, its an extraordinary turnaround, one that both Obama and Reid deserve credit for.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/12/19/the-nuclear-option-transforms-obamas-judicial-legacy/
And his final legacy after 8 years from an article from January 2017 -
How Barack Obama Transformed The Nations Courts
He filled two SCOTUS seats and made the judiciary more diverse than ever. But the GOP stopped him from doing more.
By Jennifer Bendery
WASHINGTON ― Republicans cannot wait to begin dismantling President Barack Obamas accomplishments, but theres one thing they cant undo, even with full control of Congress and the White House: his judicial legacy.
Obama will leave office with 329 of his judicial nominees confirmed to lifetime posts on federal courts. That includes two U.S. Supreme Court justices and four judges on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the two most powerful courts in the nation. Because of Obama, Democratic appointees now have a 7-4 advantage on the D.C. panel, and those judges will play a major role in deciding cases during the Trump administration related to environmental regulations, health care, national security, consumer protections and challenges to executive orders.
Obama also tilted the partisan makeup of circuit courts. Nine of the countrys 13 appeals courts now have majority Democratic appointees, compared with just one when he took office in 2009.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barack-obama-judicial-legacy_us_586c1944e4b0de3a08f9eb1f
So although there will be some natural turnover and there were still vacancies out there (because some of these courts have dozens of judge "slots" available because they include senior and emeritus judges who can fill in if necessary), there is still a big imprint out there from the Democratic side, which is why you have seen the rulings you have seen (and that's not including the GOP appointees who have ruled against the ridiculousness of the current administration).
Here is the current confirmation list (53 as of today) - http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-vacancies/confirmation-listing