Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 04:11 PM Aug 2018

McConnell cut a deal w/ Senate Dems to fast track 7 Trump judges

Last edited Tue Aug 28, 2018, 06:14 PM - Edit history (2)




McConnell says he’s negotiating with Schumer on a package of judges they can agree to fast-track to a vote.





And here it is: Senate just cut a deal to fast-track votes starting at 3:45p today on 11 nominations—including SEVEN Trump nominees to be district court judges.



Why would we do this? What did we get in return? This is all I've heard at this point.


I found out more on this . 2 of the judges, Baxter and Horan are Obama nominees.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McConnell cut a deal w/ Senate Dems to fast track 7 Trump judges (Original Post) octoberlib Aug 2018 OP
Maybe a deal we don't know about was made. Claritie Pixie Aug 2018 #1
This is going to fuck this country for decades to come onecaliberal Aug 2018 #2
They don't need us for approval so we got something. Demsrule86 Aug 2018 #11
Hoping they know what they are doing,BUT bluestarone Aug 2018 #3
+1 2naSalit Aug 2018 #5
Can't understand why we should/would EVER deal with Criminal Mitch! Jeez Va Lefty Aug 2018 #4
Why would "we" ever make a deal with them over judges? NT enough Aug 2018 #6
Jesus Fucking Christ, Schumer... Raster Aug 2018 #7
Will we ever get Democratic leadership that is as tough as Republicans? Thrill Aug 2018 #8
agreed no. nt msongs Aug 2018 #9
So depressing Power 2 the People Aug 2018 #14
Will we ever get Democratic leadership that is as tough as Republicans? LenaBaby61 Aug 2018 #16
7 Trump district seats. This better not be a deal where we come through on our end and then the JCanete Aug 2018 #10
I'd be willing to make A Deal jmowreader Aug 2018 #12
I think Chuck needs to explain this one. OnDoutside Aug 2018 #13
I found out some more on this . Apparently, Obama's appointee to the National Labor Relations Board, octoberlib Aug 2018 #15
That's not too bad all things considering the amount of leverage we have is pretty much zero. Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2018 #17
I agree. Just found out they're fast tracking 8 more next week. Something's up. Something more, octoberlib Aug 2018 #18
Harry Reid did this sort of thing in the past too BumRushDaShow Aug 2018 #19
Harry Reid was awesome! octoberlib Aug 2018 #20

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
11. They don't need us for approval so we got something.
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 05:30 PM
Aug 2018

And assuming this is true...have not seen it anywhere.

bluestarone

(16,925 posts)
3. Hoping they know what they are doing,BUT
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 04:18 PM
Aug 2018

My thoughts are we SHOULDN'T BE FAST TRACKING A GOD-DAM THING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Raster

(20,998 posts)
7. Jesus Fucking Christ, Schumer...
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 04:25 PM
Aug 2018

...you do understand they are STACKING the Courts with right-wing, Federalist Society judges at a record-breaking pace, right?

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
16. Will we ever get Democratic leadership that is as tough as Republicans?
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 06:05 PM
Aug 2018
NOPE.

And, I've never liked Schumer. Too bad he'll be there if the Dems gain control of the House. I'm more scared of what HE may do say than I am of thuglicans being in the minority in the house.
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
10. 7 Trump district seats. This better not be a deal where we come through on our end and then the
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 05:21 PM
Aug 2018

republicans do what they ALWAYS do and simply refuse to follow through on theirs, and then we just whine about how we thought they were going to be honest brokers.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
12. I'd be willing to make A Deal
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 05:37 PM
Aug 2018

Seven Trump district court judges in exchange for Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
15. I found out some more on this . Apparently, Obama's appointee to the National Labor Relations Board,
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 05:57 PM
Aug 2018

Pearce, will get to stay and a couple of the 11 judges , Baxter and Horan are Obama nominees. So we got NLRB and 2 judges. Just found out Pearce wasn't confirmed, so that's out. There was an article in Bloomberg that Schumer and McConnell had made a deal on this.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
18. I agree. Just found out they're fast tracking 8 more next week. Something's up. Something more,
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 06:11 PM
Aug 2018

I mean. Normally it would take them into 2019 to confirm 15 judges.





Senate agrees unanimously to vote on seven district court nominees this afternoon, followed by eight judicial nominations next week

BumRushDaShow

(128,901 posts)
19. Harry Reid did this sort of thing in the past too
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 06:15 PM
Aug 2018

but just note that although it sounds like they are ramming through millions of judges and Obama did nothing, this is not the case.

Just as a comparison - from an article in 2014 during his 2nd term -

<...>

Finally, after years of threatening, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) went on the Senate floor in November 2013 and invoked the “nuclear option,” changing the Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for executive branch and judicial nominees (other than those for the Supreme Court).

A year later, the effect of that change is clear: The 113th Congress confirmed 132 district and circuit court judges, including 89 this year. That’s the highest single-year total in 20 years, and the highest two-year total since 1980. (That’s particularly impressive considering that this Congress was one of the least productive in history.) On Tuesday night alone, the Senate confirmed 12 nominees. All this means that the once-lagging Obama has now appointed more judges in his first six years (305) than Reagan, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush. And because Obama has gone out of his way to nominate judges from a wide array of backgrounds, the federal bench is more diverse than ever. All in all, it’s an extraordinary turnaround, one that both Obama and Reid deserve credit for.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/12/19/the-nuclear-option-transforms-obamas-judicial-legacy/


And his final legacy after 8 years from an article from January 2017 -

POLITICS 01/12/2017 07:00 am ET Updated Jan 12, 2017

How Barack Obama Transformed The Nation’s Courts
He filled two SCOTUS seats and made the judiciary more diverse than ever. But the GOP stopped him from doing more.

By Jennifer Bendery


WASHINGTON ― Republicans cannot wait to begin dismantling President Barack Obama’s accomplishments, but there’s one thing they can’t undo, even with full control of Congress and the White House: his judicial legacy.

Obama will leave office with 329 of his judicial nominees confirmed to lifetime posts on federal courts. That includes two U.S. Supreme Court justices and four judges on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the two most powerful courts in the nation. Because of Obama, Democratic appointees now have a 7-4 advantage on the D.C. panel, and those judges will play a major role in deciding cases during the Trump administration related to environmental regulations, health care, national security, consumer protections and challenges to executive orders.

Obama also tilted the partisan makeup of circuit courts. Nine of the country’s 13 appeals courts now have majority Democratic appointees, compared with just one when he took office in 2009.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barack-obama-judicial-legacy_us_586c1944e4b0de3a08f9eb1f


So although there will be some natural turnover and there were still vacancies out there (because some of these courts have dozens of judge "slots" available because they include senior and emeritus judges who can fill in if necessary), there is still a big imprint out there from the Democratic side, which is why you have seen the rulings you have seen (and that's not including the GOP appointees who have ruled against the ridiculousness of the current administration).

Here is the current confirmation list (53 as of today) - http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-vacancies/confirmation-listing
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McConnell cut a deal w/ S...