Katy Tur can take a hike

[vlyons]

She has Scarramuchi on right now explaining Trump's POV about supporting Putin. Does she often give a platform to Repub talking heads? I changed the channel. I'm refuse to listen to that crap.

[OliverQ]

1. Same here, although I'm guessing the producers booked him not Katy.

But I'm so sick of these idiots being put on.

[katmondoo]

5. I get so mad I keep wondering why I even listen to these people

I once trusted MSNBC now I think I am nuts, they are all doing this to us, not a patriot left on cable news.

[OliverQ]

6. Rachael and Lawrence.

[katmondoo]

11. Yes, they are our salvation. I love Rachel and Lawrence

[bdamomma]

13. they are the only ones I watch, Rachel and Lawrence.

Randi Rhodes I listen too I love her passion, and also Amy Goodman Democracy now.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

2. She doesn't often interview Trumpists, but I was wondering why she (or her producers)

would waste a single minute on a scumball like Scaramucci. I changed the station too.

[bettyellen]

7. I feel like she enjoys her but if fame from being a Trump punching bag and needs to get over it...

It’s not like she actually earned his ire with great journalism, but I increasingly feel like she thinks she needs them to be relevant. And her jokes are dumb.

[Tatiana]

10. She may not have a choice.

Sometimes the guests are already booked. I can see why the network would want a polarizing idiot like Scaramucci on. He's viewed as entertaining and possibly a ratings-draw.

But I always turn him off when he's on.

[lapfog_1]

3. turned it off... don't need to listen to that asshole say anything.

he isn't relevant to anything right now.

[uponit7771]

4. You WANT to know their talking points, MOST of the time those segments aren't for the typical online

... politico who's aware of anything.

As long as she presses him for the truth and negates the distractions its worth it

[vlyons]

8. well if her producers are going to book like him, shercan at least ask some decent questions

Such as, "What do you think about the fact that Trump has been lying about Russian attacks on our elections for a year and a half?

[maxsolomon]

9. There's no one else to talk to.

Except Kellyanne.

Who would you suggest that MSNBC invite to represent this Administration or a "reasonable" pro-Trump viewpoint?

[unitedwethrive]

12. She is a horrible anchor. Always mis-speaking and confused, and does not seem to know her stuff

as well as she should to ask the hard questions. She was a much better correspondent. I routinely turn the channel during her hour(s).

[JonLP24]

14. could be producers

All I have is CNN as far as live news and it sucks, they bring on the one guy left defending Trump. Throw cold water on the T word and speculate whether Democrats gave Republicans a gift when Trump is the gift that keeps on giving but unfortunately he's causing a lot of harm in the process.

[shraby]

15. Katy Tur is as reliable as Maddow and O'Donnell for holding the administration's feet to the fire.

She gets right into their face on their lies.

[Hoyt]

16. That's what I think too. Short of chasing them out of the studio while kicking their rear, is

considered being to easy on GOPers around here. I get it, but it's just not realistic. Heck, most of the GOPers do themselves in just by uttering their BS, again to anyone who listens.

I wonder what people want -- another replacement like Big Ed, who sounded good until he became a Russian asset himself, even if unwittingly.

[JonLP24]

17. I don't even want them to give them a microphone

[Hoyt]

18. I'm fine with David Frum, etc., calling trump, "The worst security risk in US history," and the like

I agree, some of the solid trumpsters are annoying and deserve a punch in the mouth, but . . . . . .

[TeamPooka]

19. Note to MSNBC: I change the channel anytime the Mooch or Hugh Hewitt show up on screen.

I go over to CNN anytime this happens