General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPerfect Howard Fineman tweet on Michelle Wolf
Link to tweet
?s=21
RE #MichelleWolf: 1. Yep: blunt, crude, pitiless. Remind you of, say, a president? 2. She torched EVERYONE, even #Dems, #Stormy, #media. 3. She wasnt playing to all America or the room, but to her #Netflix deal. 4. She was INVITED. 5. Its not her job to behave. 6. Shes funny.
TNLib
(1,819 posts)nt
mountain grammy
(26,663 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)To give them cover until it was too late to stop them without unspeakable bloodshed.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It seemed to get a very positive reaction at the Democratic National Convention.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Those exceptions where applying it would make matters worse.
I am similarly anti war. But keeping out of World War II is an exception. There are others.
When they how low we go high is a good rule but it is not dogma.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)In other circumstances, you would not think such remarks are appropriate?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,858 posts)Act like Michelle O. Until then, she's a free agent.
but I do think Michelle is great
LiberalLovinLug
(14,178 posts)But can turn quickly into hyperbole now that we lost. That's a sad thing, I'm not celebrating it. Its just a fact.
The other side has been waging against us with trench warfare, where anything goes. It does no good to stand above them in the open and wag our fingers as they pick us off one by one from their sheltered trenches, and then laugh as we fall one by one.
Unfortunately, we now must wrinkle our noses, look down once more at our nice clean hipster outfits, and jump down into those same trenches and get ourselves dirty. Its not fun, but its necessary.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)The RW has slandered Democrats ever since Reagan got elected. I was 23 when he was elected, and I am sick of hearing their bullshit with no corresponding pushback.
I think we should push their faces into the bullshit they're strewing, and rub it around a bit.
Metaphorically speaking, of course!
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Ohh, they do make them. https://www.teepublic.com/t-shirts/fuck-trump-and-fuck-you-for-voting-for-him
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)That is a bargain!
Oppaloopa
(867 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)The election result shows what that has come to.
forgotmylogin
(7,539 posts)What you don't do is crinkle into a corner and believe them when they say we deserved it and it won't happen again.
You sock the attacker in the jaw, then get out of the house.
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)Punch and walk away.
What offends me is the news media tut tutting about the insults, then showing Trump saying the most hateful things about others as if the Commedienne did something worse.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)If every democrat went high 100% of the time, the right wing propaganda machine would face no checks and run roughshod across America.
Those who understand propaganda and PR know that you need most people to go high while a few surrogates call the lies what they are. And the worse the lies, the more directly they must be countered.
Comatose Sphagetti
(836 posts)It should always be the tactic of first choice when dealing with "normal" humanity.
Right-wing authoritarians are not normal, they are sociopaths who see nobility, grace, compassion etc., as a weakness to be exploited. "Turn the other cheek" and they will smack it and laugh.
We as liberals/democrats have tried going high for decades and look what it has wrought us.
Fight back.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)you do that.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)It was nice cookie fortune wisdom when everyone thought Anal Cyst was not getting installed.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)She laughed at that.
I don't think that she was talking about comedians - especially those who are speaking truth to power.
Sailor65x1
(554 posts)Those in history who required bloodshed to remedy were never concerned with the words of comedians in the first place.
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)Without cruelty. You can use sarcasm, humor at times. But those who were offended last night do not know the meaning of humor.going personal is crude and rude.
Discussing Sanders looks was rude. But KellyAnnes lies are facts.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I think a lot of people misheard 'facts' as fat, and "ash" as ass.
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think we should all aspire to her grace and dignity.
Kingofalldems
(38,503 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,242 posts)tenderfoot
(8,438 posts)BootinUp
(47,209 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)it is a controversial subject.
As for Michelle O.. She is not a comedienne. Michelle W is.
If 'we' keep bending over, we will continue to be fucked. It is well past time to fight back. When a bully senses weakness, he/she will attack. When one fights back, the bully will retreat like the coward he/she is.
In this case I am with Michelle W.
(Of course I am also with Michelle O.)
fierywoman
(7,702 posts)dumdrum
(16 posts)fuck, fight, or hold the light
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Generally speaking I think it's good advice not to stoop to their level.
This dinner is meant to be in the spirit of camaraderie and good humor (at least according to the organization's president) - so I think a few gentle jabs, a la Jay Leno vis-a-vis Barack Obama, is more in the spirit of the event.
I'd love for Democrats and other progressive folks to have the reputation of being too kind and courteous - let that be our main flaw.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)First we must win the war for America.
Only then can we return to grace.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I do also think civility can be as effective as being mean-spirited (even if its warranted).
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 30, 2018, 12:19 PM - Edit history (1)
http://time.com/4313607/white-house-correspondents-dinner-2016-larry-wilmore-n-word/I think that at a roast, the rules are different.
Willmore knew that only the conservatives would blanch at that word, and the rest of us understood what he was doing.
He was acting as though he and Obama, two men of color, were setting the tone in the room, not white people.
He deployed a word that was usually only used acceptably among people of color with each other. He gave white people the experience of being "outsiders" at a traditionally very white, very elite event.
I think that what Wolf did (at the same event years later) was similar - she gave them an idea of what it was like to listen to someone who didn't care about shattering the norms that everyone expected.
It was performance art, and it was Brechtian.
MurrayDelph
(5,302 posts)He who turns the other cheek will get hit with the other first.
paleotn
(18,003 posts)like that's worked so well in the recent past.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Because if they werent allowed to push the edge then there wouldnt be any roasts.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Sailor65x1
(554 posts)Of constantly becoming what it claims to hate, and somehow internally justifying it.
LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)John Fante
(3,479 posts)When did this happen?
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)That's basically what happened. It might be "petty" to say McConnell is getting his neck circumcised, but I don't think that kind of joke is what people are grousing about. The "cruel" ones were about Sanders being a lying sack of shit, Bill O'Reilly being a sexual harasser, the GOP running pedophile candidates, and Paul Ryan being a coward. None of that is bullying, it's all true and it deserves to be pointed out. These people get far too much respect - its all for the sake of decorum and not because they deserve it.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
oberliner
(58,724 posts)We long-timers have to stick together - it can get rough sometimes!
John Fante
(3,479 posts)Did she attempt to take away healthcare from millions of Americans?
Is she splitting up families with gleeful abandon?
Has she attempted to ban an entire religion from entering the country?
Did she attempt to ban transgenders from serving in the armed forces?
What's that? No, she didn't? She only told dirty jokes? Then your point is ridiculous and invalid.
The Polack MSgt
(13,200 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)Alle nordmenn oppfordres til å vise ro og besindighet i denne for vårt land så vanskelige situasjon. Ved felles anstrengelser og alles godvilje skal vi berge Norge fritt og frelst gjennom denne svære krise.
Jeg tilføyer at slik som situasjonen har utviklet seg, er enhver fortsatt motstand ikke bare nytteløs, men direkte ensbetydende med kriminell ødeleggelse av liv og eiendom. Enhver embedsmann og andre stats- og kommunale tjenestemenn og i særdeleshet alle våre lands offiserer i hær, marine, kystartilleri og luftvåpen er forpliktet til å lyde ordre utelukkende fra den nye, nasjonale regjering. Enhver avvikelse herfra vil medføre det alvorligste personlige ansvar for vedkommende. Forøvrig vil det bli gått rettferdig og hensynsfullt frem mot alle landsmenn.
---
All Norwegians are encouraged to show calm and prudence in this so difficult situation for our country. Through common efforts and everyone's will, we will save Norway freely and saved through this difficult crisis.
I add that as the situation has evolved, any remaining resistance is not just useless, but directly meaning criminal destruction of life and property. Any civil servant and other state and municipal officials and in particular all our country's officers in the army, navy, coastal artillery and air force are obliged to obey orders exclusively from the new national government. Any deviation from this will cause the most serious personal responsibility for the person. Besides, it will be fair and considerate towards all the countrymen.
---
That man's name? Vidkun Quisling.
UTUSN
(70,779 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 29, 2018, 11:09 PM - Edit history (3)
PatrickforO
(14,602 posts)But, you know, this isn't the first time the press has been called out.
I can remember Jon Stewart appearing on Meet the Press. They were almost genuflecting to him, because he really is a genius as a comedian, and he turned on them. Or, perhaps, like Wolf, made them feel darned uncomfortable. He told them they suck and that it is pathetic when people get their news from a comedian rather than supposedly credible shows like MtP.
We're so going the wrong direction...why? because the snake Reagan allowed the Fairness Doctrine to die and we need a new one. Look at Sinclair Media Group - a reporter working at one of the stations they own was silenced for not giving 'balanced' reporting on climate change. What bullshit!
So, yeah, once again a comedian has to tell the press they suck, but it isn't really the press, is it? It is that the lack of a Fairness Doctrine has made what should be the news dependent on ratings. The news should be above ratings. Because when they are dependent on ratings, how can we tell if what they are reporting is true, or is what they are spouting the 'truth' their corporate sponsors feel we should have?
We have left the shore of truth and are now being washed down the river of lies.
pamela
(3,469 posts)And it was fucking awesome!
Only reason I'm correcting you on that is so people who have never seen that can find it if they want to. Crossfire was taken off the air not long after the Stewart incident so the young ones may not even know what it was.
Pluvious
(4,332 posts)FakeNoose
(32,854 posts)The absence of the Fairness Doctrine has changed everything.
I really wish Bill Clinton had reinstated Fairness when he became Potus in 1992. There was still time to nip it in the bud because Rush Limbaugh had barely gone national at that point. Faux News didn't even exist yet. To reinstate it now (post-Cheeto) will be a very big deal.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)Well I am a British ex-pat so I'm biased. UK broadcasters have to abide by a fairness doctrine of sorts. I know that when I turn to BBC, ITV or Sky that the news will be relativey fair and balanced. BBC has more resources in the US than ITV or Sky (tieups with PBS and CBS), so they do cover more US stuff than the other two. ITV despite its cutbacks are still better for UK domestic news IMO.
I don't think the fairness doctrine can be reinstated in the US at this point. The only thing I can think of is if there was some outside organisation that media organisations would clamour to earn some sort of certification from to prove they do fair and balanced reporting. Maybe an Emmy award?
Pluvious
(4,332 posts)Edited down to a 1 minute clip, to minimize the torment
( wait for it... It's the last three seconds of this clip )
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)Going on, Crossfire, telling tucker and Paul they were destroying the country.
The next week Crossfire was cancelled. Jon did not dream he had that power.
His humor was funny not hateful.
ollie10
(2,091 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Did you find that equally offensive?
Did that set back progress for people of color, like you think Wolf has done with women's reproductive rights?
And did you see the 2004 Democratic Convention coverage, where abortion and LGBTQs were described in terms that conservatives use?
You certainly don't know much about the Daily Show now, if you think "nobody heard of Michelle Wolf."
marble falls
(57,427 posts)tblue37
(65,524 posts)SunSeeker
(51,787 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,573 posts)The Tempest in a Teacup scandal.
TeamPooka
(24,286 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Is successful opposition to Trumpism a matter of winning a race to the bottom of the comedic sewer? The jokes about Sanders' appearance are no funnier than the ones about Democrats. Joining this party legitimizes them.
CrispyQ
(36,552 posts)The end, where she said, "Flint still doesn't have clean water," should have gotten her a standing ovation & this morning every news show should be talking about that. I don't have the tube on, but I'll bet Flint isn't even on the MSM radar, except in reference to Wolf.
Michelle Wolf
ollie10
(2,091 posts)Michelle was whiney. Shock value and cheap shots aren't humor. She would have been better served to focus more on the issues and less on petty personal attacks. At the end of the day she helped Trump WAY more than she hurt him
zeusdogmom
(999 posts)Im not offended by crude or off color language but she she used so much of it that she lost the shock value of it. I was listening to an audio feed - she wasnt especially funny or entertaining. Defiantly whiny - and have been around whiny 3 year olds all weekend. Nana doesnt understand you when you whine😃
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)to come to you for comedy recommendations. To me she was funny and spot on. Your description isn't the performance I saw and as far as helping donald I don't see it.
Do you know and enjoy the "Roast" format? I ask because this was a pretty standard roast and some people don't care for that style at all. Anyway, we clearly have different taste in comedy that much is certain.
ollie10
(2,091 posts)I also know that making fun of a handicapped journalist was HORRIBLE. It is distressing that similar stuff happened last night.
We are supposed to be better than that....
Obviously Michelle was not
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)as somehow equivalent to donald mocking the disabled reporter we lack enough commonality to have a meaningful discussion. Regardless of how crude and mean her routine was it was a routine that is supposed to be a roast. Her remarks were delivered in the proper venue. What donald did was not proper for the venue or the role he was playing. Not to mention his remarks were considerably more offensive.
ollie10
(2,091 posts)The late night comedians roast Trump and Co every night. They do a much better job and don't resort to Michelle's tactics. She wasn't even funny. Just whiny and mistaking shock value with humor. Not exactly a big response to her "jokes" from the audience. Many were embarrassed.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)It was a well-written, and well-delivered routine. You apparently don't understand the tradition.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Michelle Obama is laughing there, so I guess her "we go high" was about legislating and political discourse, and not comedians at a roast.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I really think you are looking for ways to demean her now.
What is your issue with her?
You don't have it with Jon Stewart.
You don't have it with Colbert.
Just saying.
ollie10
(2,091 posts)I am not interested in talking with someone who misrepresents what I have said.
Need I remind you?
I mean, if it turns you on, keep on trying to provoke a reaction from me.
My only reaction, however, will be to remind you I am not interested in speaking with you.
Maybe in the future you will have cooled off or something, but let's call it a day today
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I also know that making fun of a handicapped journalist was HORRIBLE. It is distressing that similar stuff happened last night.
We are supposed to be better than that....
Obviously Michelle was not
You said that Wolf was no better than DT when he made fun of a handicapped journalist. Or were you talking about another Michelle?
The fact that you keep trying to deny it shows how upset you are being called out on it.
And you keep saying that you "are not interested in speaking with" me, and keep saying bye, but you still come back when I make a point that isn't very flattering about what you yourself said.
Maybe in the future you will have cooled off enough to just own what you are saying, but I'm sure you'll be back just as soon as I hit a nerve again.
Have a nice day!
ollie10
(2,091 posts)Nice.....
Another reason not to take you seriously
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)No one is forcing you to post here, are they?
Now go ahead and tell me yet again, that you aren't going to continue this conversation.
If you didn't take me seriously, you wouldn't bother to reply. Repeatedly. After you say that you "are finished."
Who can take someone seriously when they say, "I'm done here," "Let's call it a day" "bye" then come back repeatedly to tell the subject of their wrath that they "can't be taken seriously."
The trolling going here on isn't in my posts. The fact that you can't make someone else stop calling your posts what they are is your own issue. "Let's call it a day" is another way of saying, "STOP IT NOW!!" Trying to appear non-chalant isn't really working - especially when you accuse someone of trolling.
See you soon.
ollie10
(2,091 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)that you seem to discern.
Please enlighten us.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)your comment that the routine by Michelle Wolf at the White House Correspondence Dinner was as bad as donald mocking the disabled journalist? Truly our perspectives are so different that there is no hope of meaningful discussion.
ollie10
(2,091 posts)The bit about don't knock abortions unless you have tried one.....was tone deaf, counter productive and not at all funny, unless you think abortions are funny things.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)when episodes opened by saying they were coming to you live from Boston, featuring: black people; trial lawyers; abortions for everybody; organized labor; godless sodomites; and a parking lot full of egg shaped hybrid cars.
The pro-choice movement wasn't "set back," nor that of the LGBTQ community. People understood that it was a mocking of conservative caricatures of liberals. Genuine progressives and feminists did, anyway.
The mindset you need to be in to find Wolf's deliberately throwaway comments Abortion funny was the pro-choice understanding that she is mocking what conservatives say about women who have abortions. You seem to feel as though you are the butt of her joke, strangely.
You seem to have a mindset that she was targeting, those that she knew would clutch their pearls to hear a woman talk about abortion not only unapologetically, but brazenly mocking their hateful, narrow misconception of the "abortion of convenience" harpy who lurks in their misogynist minds.
You reacted just like they did, and not like those feminists and progressives here on DU. That's pretty significant.
Response to ehrnst (Reply #97)
ollie10 This message was self-deleted by its author.
ollie10
(2,091 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Somehow I thought so.
You don't know about who is on the Daily Show, yes?
The Daily Show didn't tank progress for women with their abortion joke, as you say you believe Wolf's will do, did it?
You are "getting the vapahs" from Michelle Wolf's satire the same way that conservatives are, who tolerate much worse in real life from a real life president who is actually setting back women's rights. Yes?
Did Wolf mock a disabled person ? Did she ask about "blood coming out Megan Kelly's whatever" ? How about "Grabbing Pussy" ?
Your equivalency of her "going low" with DT misses her point as much as if you had been one of the right wingers clutching their pearls.
Yes?
ollie10
(2,091 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Have a nice day.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I've tried to make this same point and it has not gone over well here.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)She's not being "Trumplike." And no she didn't "help DT" more than she hurt him.
You also don't seem to understand that difference between a roast and a political speech....
I guess Jon Stewart was equally using shock value and a petty personal attack, and helped Bernie Goldberg.
Do you still "miss him?"
spanone
(135,921 posts)raven mad
(4,940 posts)CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)As far as I can see, unlike her marks, she told no lies.
grumpyduck
(6,278 posts)bordered on not funny, regardless of how on the spot she was. I think she could have still been on the spot, and more biting, with slightly different material.
Obviously I don't know if she or her writers watched clips of other roasts (not just WHCD) while preparing her material, but I'm going to guess that they did not. If nothing else, she did make a lot of people very uncomfortable and got a lot of press attention out of it.
I'll see if I can find a video of Colbert's routine at the WHCD in '06 and maybe a couple of others.
John Fante
(3,479 posts)racist fascist asshole yourself.
Comical false equivalences from the usual suspects.
arthritisR_US
(7,300 posts)DFW
(54,480 posts)I watched the whole speech, and didn't laugh once.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)DFW
(54,480 posts)gibraltar72
(7,517 posts)Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,601 posts)At least she showed up, which is more than Donnie Two Scoops did.
If people want to complain about her act, they should talk to the person who booked her. And then that person should ignore them and book Michelle again next year...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Margaret Talev is the person who booked her.
How did you decide on Michelle Wolf to entertain at this years dinner?
I liked the idea of someone who is not known as a political comedian, someone who is known more as a cultural comedian. Her brand traditionally has not been American politics. Many of her jokes are about the differences between men and women, but as you might have noticed, 2017 was a pretty important year to raise awareness and questions about the standing of American women in society, and in the media as well as politics and Wall Street and entertainment. I think she is an interesting person, too. She had all of these other careers before she fell into comedy.
http://variety.com/2018/politics/news/margaret-talev-white-house-correspondents-association-1202784143/
colorado_ufo
(5,742 posts)True Blue American
(17,995 posts)What is the problem? News media bitching about Wolf!
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)They think it's knee slappingly funny when dt is doing it, but, get all appalled when they hear it from a comedian. These guys have zero credibility regarding taste. Buncha dt butt kissers. Trying HARD to look shocked and unamused.
oasis
(49,455 posts)pansypoo53219
(21,005 posts)Lunabell
(6,133 posts)I'm not so sure she would be proud.
Paladin
(28,281 posts)Glad to see there's at least one DC journalist I can still respect and with whom I can agree.
Timmygoat
(779 posts)Compared to this piece of s**t president, if anyone has listened to just one of his rallies, everyones stupid liars, he calls every person he does not agree with stupid, and the name-calling, he needs his mouth washed out with soap. A kid who dropped to his level would get punished.
Paladin
(28,281 posts)There was absolutely no need for them to go public and grovel for trump's benefit.