General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust want to say that catfight is a sexist term
There is no acceptable usage for it, unless referring to actual cats.
IMHO
Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)Sinistrous
(4,249 posts)Unless tomcats aren't really cats.
George II
(67,782 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)...it's gonna read as sexist when the parties involved are women.
Even with men, though, it will carry overtones of emasculation and toxic feminization without clear context.
pnwmom
(109,023 posts)Similarly, the word pussy is only connected to women, even though the term pussycat applies to both genders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catfight
Catfight (also girl fight) is a term for an altercation between two women, often characterized as involving scratching, slapping, hair-pulling, and shirt-shredding. It can also be used to describe women insulting each other verbally or engaged in an intense competition for men, power, or occupational success.[1] The catfight has been a staple of American news media and popular culture since the 1940s, and use of the term is often considered derogatory or belittling.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)trof
(54,256 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)who are presumed to be hissy and screechy and scratchy, like cats - small, furry animals who make a lot of noise without doing much damage. (Yes, tomcats also, or especially, fight, but they are also hissy, screechy and scratchy.) To describe an argument between two women in those terms is insulting and sexist - women are quite capable of arguing, even vehemently, without screeching or clawing. I love cats but I hate that term.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Abu Pepe
(637 posts)on the planet. I like cats too but holy crap.
Also. Your post is spot on. It means to females fighting and is often used as a sexist metaphore for professional women disagreeing in the work place.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)But the noise obviously does not deter them, since there are a lot of cats.
Abu Pepe
(637 posts)Well the act istelf is pretty shocking, the ear biting combined with the demonic sound.
Dog sex, though, is kind of funny.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)Abu Pepe
(637 posts)not saying that's cool. But an early memory.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 23, 2018, 09:50 AM - Edit history (1)
You've evidently never been on the receiving end of a pissed off cat
G_j
(40,372 posts)I feel the term is inappropriate used in that way.
Thanks.
mountain grammy
(26,663 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)angel823
(409 posts)spot on
Angel in Texasperated
Iggo
(47,587 posts)Thank you.
Crunchy Frog
(26,701 posts)and one should at least be able to use that term to call out or identify that trope. JMHO.
pnwmom
(109,023 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)Odoreida
(1,549 posts)Just lucky?
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)That's what this is all about.
Odoreida
(1,549 posts)blake2012
(1,294 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)But the term is used as a metaphor for fights or arguments between women, because fighting cats of both genders hiss, screech and claw - attributes assigned to women. Have you ever heard an argument between men described as a cat fight? Me either.
Igel
(35,386 posts)Not mostly, but yeah.
The problem is that any derogatory term applied to describe a negative feature or behavior is viewed as negative and a bad thing to be on the receiving end of, whether it's you or your group. When it's applied mostly to one sex, it's obligatorily sexist (where a positive term applied to one sex is still positive). Even if it's not applied to one sex in practice, it's easy to overlook--it's especially easy to ignore occasional counter examples once there's an argument to be won by denying they exist. We don't like bad things said about our identity, in other words.
The style of arguing and fighting termed a "cat fight" was, however, very similar when it was between men. Or between men and women.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)I'm not sure how I feel about it.
Vinca
(50,323 posts)cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)Just know that women will consider you sexist and the smart ones won't want to talk to you at all.
Vinca
(50,323 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)And thats just as good
cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)but they'll just think you're an asshole.
Now that was nasty, and I apologize, but I think it's pretty funny, so I'll go ahead and post this.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)I AM an asshole, and Im not too big to
Admit it
And Im not offended. And if I was, so what? Its not as if Ill wake up with the Black Plague tomorrow
What happened?
Well, someone on the internet called me an asshole (or used the term Catfight) and I was offended. And this morning I woke up with the Black Plague
Well, youre fucked, mate
cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)Drunk at a recent party I belligerently told the amateur magician how his trick was done. But I did apologize, to his delight, because what I'd pointed out was supposed to have been obvious. Now that kind of action requires a *real* asshole, and that's me.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)Did someone tell you that? Or is that your own conclusion?
A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)And secondly, there are some actual fights between women that do resemble a fight between cats, hence the reference, just as there are fights between men that resemble fights between animals of other sorts and are characterized that way In movies and other media.
Frankly, none of the women I have been close to in my life, the vast majority of intellect and good humor, would be offended by the term to the point that they would make an issue of it, because they would have seen the expression for what it is - a stereotype - NOT because they are so wrapped up in the silliness in which this OP is predicated.
Bill Maher made a great point;
It isnt just that some folks wont walk into a room full of sharp objects, they want everyone else to wear bubble wrap.
I dont go out of my way to hurt anyones feelings, and I certainly have used the term before because its part of the lexicon.
But....
This is the internet, for fucks sake! You dont have the right to not be offended and if you are, so what?
NOTHING BLOODY HAPPENS TO YOU!!!
Im still waiting for your argument
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)and so what if it does?
If that's the rule, why can't we use all the other words that offend some people, like "n-----" and any number of others that are "part of the lexicon"? Because the people to whom those words are applied don't have the right not to be offended either, right? And if they are, so what?
A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)Mansplaining, eh?
Offering my opinion on a word is mansplaining.
Fascinating
As far as the rest of your post, well shit. What can I say? You got me. Because using the N word shares the exact same history and has the same offensive potential.
Yup.
I see how you have convinced me.
Jesus Hornblower Christ burning a thesaurus
Just for fun, the thesaurus entry;
catfight [ kat-fahyt ]
Main Entry: quarrel
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: disagreement
Synonyms: affray, altercation, argument, battle royal, beef, bickering, brannigan, brawl, breach, broil, catfight, combat, commotion, complaint, contention, controversy, difference, difference of opinion, difficulty, disapproval, discord, disputation, dispute, dissension, dissidence, disturbance, dust*, falling-out, feud, fight, fisticuffs, fracas, fray, fuss, hassle, misunderstanding, objection, rhubarb, row, ruckus*, run-in, scrap, set-to, spat, squabble, strife, struggle, tiff, tumult, vendetta, wrangle
Antonyms: agreement, peace
They even list Catfight as a synonym
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)although lots of nice white men will be happy to explain that "n......" is just a mispronunciation of a perfectly harmless Spanish word for "black," and wonder why people take such offense.
Likewise you can give me all the thesaurus definitions you want, "catfight" when applied to an argument between women is still sexist. Is it in the same league as "c..."? No, but it's still sexist. You can use it if you want but you can't tell me how I should feel about it.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)What I said was you dont have a RIGHT to NOT be offended.
It doesnt exist.
Now I certainly appreciate how words can be hurtful and demeaning and cruel and many other things, and if you have ever read anything I posted with regularity over the last 15 years, since we both became members here only weeks apart, you would know that I am not the type of person to be intentionally cruel or disrespectful. Sure, Ive had
My moments over the years, and I regret them, but it isnt my habit.
So I resent the implication that I am somehow guilty of that general insensitivity
But Im sure as hell not going to start a bloody thread about it.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)But everyone does have the right to call out language that is sexist, racist, or otherwise offensive to them or to someone else. If you want to call me an oversensitive snowflake with no sense of humor, that's your right. Women get that a lot when they object to sexist language and behavior.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)I used NONE of those terms toward you or anyone else, and you most certainly have the right to call out language you find offensive
What you DONT have is the right to demand everyone else live (or type, as the case may be) as you deem fit.
Is that fair?
And if you havent already, please re-read my above post, as I hit post before I finished it earlier
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)If you want to use it that's your (male) privilege. If you don't get why it's sexist I can't help you.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,382 posts)I didnt call you anything of the sort
And I also never said I didnt think it wasnt sexist, but since it is clear now that you prefer to put
Words in my mouth, Ill just end this here
kennetha
(3,666 posts)It just shouldn't be used. Ever.
See, two can play that game.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I'm sick to death of so many on the left wasting their time on this BULLSHIT. So you're offended - move the fuck on and grow the fuck up.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I'm a woman and agreed with each and every word in that post AND also completely agree with Bill Maher. Go wrap yourself up in bubble wrap and leave the scolding for kindergarden teachers.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)because you didn't offend me. I can't be bothered to give a crap about what each and every person finds offensive.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)at this entire thread since yesterday. If you think this is what anger looks like, you need a better barometer. Feel free to focus on the BS all you want.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)honor your opinion about what's appropriate. That's irony there.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)a damn thing. Or telling them I'm going to think less of them. Or telling them they need to agree with me or else they're obviously a racist, misogynist, bigot, etc. Are you getting the difference yet?
Squinch
(51,080 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)That was helpful advice. I don't like the left being labeled whiners and that's all that nonsense like this does.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)Wow.
Response to Squinch (Reply #70)
A HERETIC I AM This message was self-deleted by its author.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I wouldn't be bothered in the slightest and have used it recently myself to describe the battle between donnie and stormy daniels. Just more bullshit about what we can and can't say because SOME people spend their lives looking to be outraged about something.
G_j
(40,372 posts)the potential of two women getting into a cat fight?
That is the common usage I have heard during my lifetime. The most generous way to describe it is stupid,
though its obviously sexist also.
Its not about being thin skinned or overly sensitive. Its more about evolving beyond stupidity.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I use it myself - and have very recently - to describe 2 PEOPLE fighting in public. Since we're never going to be able to stamp out all language that someone, somewhere finds offensive, perhaps we should just get better at dealing with it and shrugging it off.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I too pretend that simple discussion is an antecedent to fainting couches as well. When we have nothing else of real substance, we're forced to rely on petulance... regardless of the furniture you pretend to need in your home.
I'm sure though that you'll pretend your petulance is something entirely different (as who but the honest would admit to petulance?). Maybe Righteous Pragmatism, it seems to be getting traction as a branding effort. Fits on a t-shirt.
BannonsLiver
(16,542 posts)Though TBH that doesnt sound a whole helluva lot better.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)x 2
BannonsLiver
(16,542 posts)Pussy is a euphemism for several things including cats. Try and keep up.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)can't believe someone would be so open with creepy sexism.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)We are not cats.
dameatball
(7,403 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)I also learned that lesson the hard way and have battle scars.
Catfights are scary mean, but am in agreement that it's a sexist term.
And while we're at it, can we stop calling an undershirt a "wife-beater?"
Thank you.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)An angry cat is like a hairy chainsaw, and trying to break up a fight is like sticking your hand in a Cuisinart. I'll never do that again.
whathehell
(29,103 posts).
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)No fight between men has ever been called a catfight. "Catfight" devalues and disrespects the fight, whatever it's about. "Panties in a wad" is another one.
dameatball
(7,403 posts)cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)rzemanfl
(29,581 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)by those not engaged in the fight? That can't be a general truth. Most fights are pointless.
cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)I agree that most fights are stupid, but if people one respects engage in a fight, I assume the point of the fight would be something worth respecting.
And if men's fights are not referred to as "catfights," does that mean that men's fights are more worthy of respect (through not being compared to yowling, scratching felines fighting over a piece of tuna)?
kennetha
(3,666 posts)as a way to dismiss them as about out of control male ego.
cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)but I do often use the term "pissing contest" myself. For which I apologize to all pissers everywhere.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)a noisy but inconsequential confrontation between a couple of little creatures who are no more important than house pets.
cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)here at DU, where I know people are progressive and have nothing but good intentions, is that there is massive resistance to being educated as to what is offensive to some people. Predictably, when anything like this is brought up, there is a segment of our population who will be threatened by the idea and stick to their right to say anything they please, no matter who it offends.
Good luck to them. They will self-identify in conversation, sooner or later, as misogynists or at the very least clods with no concern for others' feelings. At least now they can't claim they didn't know any better.
I guess these same people ignore the fact that the N word, k*ke, sl*pe, h*rp, etc. etc. are offensive to some people and feel free to use them.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)Granted, "catfight" isn't as overtly offensive as some other expressions I can think of, but the connotation is sexist, and obviously so. Of course people can use whatever words they want; it's not a matter of telling them they must not use certain words, but simply of pointing out their underlying sense. It seems to me that those who are offended by other people being offended, or at least concerned, about that usage, fall into two categories: Those who don't think a certain term is sexist at all, and those who don't care that it is. As to the first, with respect to the word "catfight," it's not only self-evidently sexist, even commonly-accepted definitions make it clear:
More than any other aspect of the catfight in todays culture, the catfights sexually arousing potential is exploited for numerous purposes. The phenomenon of catfighting as erotic entertainment for straight men is widely documented throughout the Internet, television, film, and even pornography. On numerous websites web users are overwhelmingly presented with catfighting as highly sexual, even pornographic. So many websites act as sources of catfights as pornography that it would be hard to believe the catfight can be interpreted in any other way. Venturing onto these pages (and many others) will lead a viewer to an abundance of videos and images of objectified women fighting with each other by pulling hair, scratching, and even biting each other. The interpretation of the catfight as sexy and gratifying for men is hardly uncommon on the Internet
So one can talk all day about a catfight as being merely a noisy altercation between domestic pets, but the inherent sexism is as obvious as the whiskers on a cat's face.
That leaves the second option, which is not caring that the term is sexist but using it anyway - maybe out of defiance ("You're not the boss of me and you can't tell me what words I can use!" ), or disdain for us bubble-wrapped snowflakes who are actually bothered by sexist discourse - or maybe just plain old sexism, which hasn't gone away, even among liberals.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)fights between airplanes are called dog fights.
What of it?
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)Response to G_j (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
kentuck
(111,111 posts)Two real cats were fighting outside my window last night... How could that be sexist?
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)There is no acceptable usage for it, unless referring to actual cats.
Your question is asked and answered.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)As long as it is within the rules of the forum
If you or anyone else has a problem with it:
1. Boo hoo I don't fucking care
2. It's your problem, not mine
Squinch
(51,080 posts)Such a catty thing to say! Don't pussy foot around man!
Squinch
(51,080 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)First I found it funny, but then I saw what we apparently have among us here. Unbelievable.
And every comment you have made to these lowlifes is spot on. I simply did not dare to comment myself.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)Even here among supposedly liberal Democrats, it's hard to escape the fact that our culture doesn't see women as fully human.
It makes me sad, but it doesn't surprise me. And I'm getting old, so it's easier to speak my mind.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)This is sad.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)how on earth does the use of a moderately derogatory phrase like 'cat fight' for a certain style of fighting among women suggest that "our culture doesn't see women as fully human." does this of 'cock fight' to describe a fight driven by excessive male ego suggest that "out culture doesn't see men as fully human?"
Squinch
(51,080 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)How hard is it to not use language that others find offensive?
And to purposefully close your mind to the idea that those words propagate negative stereotypes is the type of behaviour we'd expect from Republicans, not Democrats.
Sid
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)brer cat
(24,643 posts)Thanks!
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)EVERYONE has a problem with SOMETHING. And instead of just sucking it up and moving on, SOME people feel they have to show everyone how enlightened and above it by proclaiming what THEY find offensive is offensive to EVERYONE AND SHOULD NEVER BE USED EXCEPT WHEN THEY APPROVE OF THE USAGE. I'm tired of this bullshit and don't blame comedians from refusing to play in certain places. When did we become such pathetic scolds?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)than the people who are offended by that something. Would you like to borrow some bubble wrap?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)sounded better in your head. Perhaps you just give far to much thought to the language other people use rather than concentrating on things that are actually important.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Casual sexism is death by 1000 papercuts. Women are pointing out things they've been "sucking up" for years now, and this post is one of those things. Is it really so difficult to respond in a less hostile manner, such as "wow, I never realized that my language contributed in some way to keeping women down in our society"? I'm certainly not telling anyone what they can or can't say, but we just thought you might want to know why some of us think it's offensive to categorize women as cats when they engage in a fight. Personally I think if you don't get that then you're part of a problem.
Also the "everyone has a problem with something" fallback position is a favorite trope of misogynists and racists, aka "let's make America great again" by saying whatever we want, even though (especially because?) it keeps those uppity women and POC in their place.
It's okay to grow and learn and change and evolve. Some of the things we used to think were okay to say in public, are now considered highly offensive. Stubbornly clinging to language that offends others is your choice. But don't delude yourself into thinking you're not hurting anyone by doing so.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)so I focus FAR more on things that effect my life on a daily basis. Having to work harder for less money for the same recognition. I simply can't get myself worked up over whether saying two people are having a catfight (which I've always used for ANY two people having a public fight). Just like I call men pricks, dicks and dogs and I don't see them (or anyone here) having a problem with that. THIS is why companies feel perfectly justified in simply NOT hiring women. And to compare something like this to use of the "n" word is nothing but bullshit - catfight hasn't been used for hundreds of years as a SLUR against people who were originally brought here in chains and the comparison is nothing but an attempt to put people up against the wall - I don't accept that. No wonder comedians refuse to play college campuses these days.
Squinch
(51,080 posts)Men don't.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Then don't.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)OK, got it.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)And making cat fight the equivalent of Nig-er is flat out ridiculous.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Adios Gus. (Guessing a lot of women say that to you?)
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)It's also a good idea to make them engage in it so they are able to bring them down to their level.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)not think it would be necessary. Then, like I did, you might look through the comments on this post and realize it is probably futile.
cagefreesoylentgreen
(838 posts)Because I genuinely dont understand. Why are cats sexualized as female?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,968 posts)Here's a discussion of why they shouldn't be. https://www.bustle.com/articles/144945-6-reasons-cats-are-not-just-like-women-because-the-stereotypes-have-got-to-go
Phentex
(16,334 posts)The term itself refers to a fight usually between women. This is what you will find if you look up the definition. Apparently first used in 1854. I don't think anybody here is sexualizing cats one way or another. The objection is the use of a term that is by definition sexist.
Pretty obvious to most.