General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI do not agree with the spin that Comey was acting "political" ...
...when he came out with the second Clinton email investigation. Of course, politics is involved in everything but it was not the primary reason for his decision, in my opinion.
Yes, he, like most everyone else, believed that Hillary was going to win. In the sense that he did not want people to accuse him of helping Hillary by withholding the information about the new emails, it might be defined as "political"? He was mostly concerned with protecting himself and his own integrity, in my opinion.
I believe he thought he could continue the Trump investigation after Hillary became President. I think Barack Obama was mostly silent about Trump investigation for the same reason, in my opinion.
Rather than about "politics" specifically, it was more about a criminal strategy going forward after the election and after Hillary was President. Of course, in hindsight, we can interpret it in several different ways. I do not think it was primarily political.
lame54
(35,345 posts)poboy2
(2,078 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)unblock
(52,489 posts)A few days later they easily determined that there all the emails were duplicates. It was always a non-story in any objective sense.
The *only* reason it was a story was because Comey made the public aware of the theoretical possibility of new emails.
A responsible investigator would have done the analysis first, and only then made it public *if* they found new emails tied to Hillary.
Add to the doing it in the final weeks of the campaign and cry's actions are inexcusable.
Of course, even that is buying into the argument that the Hillary investigation had any merit to begin with.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)...that were attacking him at the time. They made him promise to come back to them if he found anything relating to Hillary's emails. Even though he probably knew there was nothing in them, he was weak and bowed to the pressures.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And figure out the truth faster, rather than give in and cover for the leakers. Which is what he did.
unblock
(52,489 posts)another crime foiled!
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)moondust
(20,025 posts)that, for whatever reason, Comey wanted to put his thumb on the scale and tip the election to Trump, and that that is exactly what he did. Pure Republican politics: fuel the Benghazi "cloud of suspicion" about "Crooked Hillary." I'm personally not convinced that is not what happened and that he has not been lying about it ever since. But I suppose it would be hard to prove that was his intent.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)But I do not believe that to be the case.
I do believe he was trying to protect his own integrity and weighed whether or not it would help Trump in the election. He did not think that it would make that much of a difference, in my opinion.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)The press did the same thing. A Hillary presidency would only be fun for them if everyone gave her a hard time.
lindysalsagal
(20,791 posts)or, at least that woman. Whether it was conscious or not, he could (should) have kept quiet.
I find it hard to believe he would have betrayed a man who'd been a federal-level career servant like himself. I really do.
moondust
(20,025 posts)Could have been a "glass ceiling" thing.
jalan48
(13,909 posts)agents in New York. Either way it was going to come out before the election. What was he to do?
kentuck
(111,111 posts)What would have happened if he had not made the existence of Wiener's emails public?
We do not know for a fact that it would have made a difference. Most likely, Hillary would have already been impeached by now.
jalan48
(13,909 posts)that bought the stories about Trump and prostitutes, illegitimate children, etc. and then didn't run the stories, effectively squashing them.
wishstar
(5,272 posts)Reporting I have read states that Obama WH was not told about FBI investigation into Trump Campaign/Russian collusion until January 2017 and Obama and Biden were also not informed about the Steele Dossier allegations until January 2017. The only knowledge Obama WH had was regarding Russian hacking into election systems and Russian hacking of DNC and Podesta emails. The public was only informed of the FBI investigation of Trump Campaign in March 2017 by Comey.
GallopingGhost
(2,404 posts)on MSNBC a few minutes ago. One of the panelists ended with "and Hillary Clinton should have run a better campaign." I am so sick of hearing that.
45 threatened, bragged, lied, committed treason, and these talking heads sit there and say Hillary Clinton should have run a better campaign? Are they fucking kidding??
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Funny how we never heard about this chaotic, dysfunctional campaign, and states supposedly being ignored, during the election itself.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)The activism protests weve seen since the election were about the people waking up about the oligarchy and political contributions. Somehow he thinks the Womens march was about a male candidate, as were the recent gun control marches, also the ones about police violence toward POC. Yep!
Maeve
(42,308 posts)He is very proud of his own high-mindedness and that makes him blind to where that might lead him. This time he led the rest of us with him down that hole. I suspect he was also misled by others who were not nearly as high-minded as himself (but whom he trusted).
Again, it comes back to the widely held belief that Hillary was going to win; that idea led to more than one mistake. Sigh....
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)You have laid out, in a nutshell, precisely what I think occurred.
OnDoutside
(19,986 posts)in July 2016, by even discussing the emails.
aikoaiko
(34,186 posts)...assuming a Hillary win and a Republican Congress in attack mode.
I think he now knows the normal protocol of remaining silent before an election was and is the best practice.
He wasn't trying to knock out HRC.
dawg
(10,626 posts)The Republicans bitch and moan so much about "unfair" treatment from the media, the FBI, academia, the "deep state", etc., that people tend to bend over backwards to try and please them. (And insulate themselves from any possible allegations of bias.)
But guess what?
Even after bending over backwards to coddle them, they'll end up accusing you of bias anyway.
And, technically, you *were* being biased - unwittingly biased in their favor, that is.
It speaks to a weakness in Comey's character that he allowed himself to be manipulated in this manner. But he is far from alone in his affliction.
I agree the Repubs are very good at working the refs.
Refs = Media
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Given the fact the Republicans we're going to leak the info anyway?
Just say nothing and let it leak under answered?
I see lots of gnashing of teeth but o have yet to see anyone propose an alternative to what he did.
Ghuliani and pals clearly signaled tgier intent to leak it. So what could he have done that would have been better?
dawg
(10,626 posts)"new" material.
If there was a leak, the response should have been that, although there were copies of some of Hillary's emails found residing on a laptop seized in connection with the Anthony Wiener investigation, there is no reason at all to believe they are anything other than copies of emails that had already been provided. They will be reviewed, of course, but there is no reason to think there's anything there of consequence.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)As soon as he could say it confidently.
They were not in possession of the laptop when he made the statement ahead of the leak.
My point is there was no good option.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Yes, he knew she was ahead, but he hoped, imho, that his actions could bring her down, which they did. Be careful what you wish for.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Say nothing while ghouliani and pals leaked it anyway?
lapucelle
(18,399 posts)kentuck
(111,111 posts)...the investigation was so big and so complex that it had moved into racketeering and the RICO statutes, with possible involvement from foreign sources, possibly even Russia? Then, it might not be wise to make such a premature statement?
lapucelle
(18,399 posts)would have been a good reason for keeping quiet about Trump. However, I think this also would have given Comey cover for any criticism he may have faced for not going public about the re-opening of the email investigation.
Comey's blunder in the name of circumspection was yet another example of the double standard that the Democratic nominee faced in 2016 and beyond.
Thekaspervote
(32,820 posts)For the house Intelligence committee ONLY. It wasnt a half hour before he was screaming that out to the press... fux news!
honest.abe
(8,688 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 16, 2018, 09:35 AM - Edit history (1)
That has been my opinion all along even though it angered me to no end when it happened.