Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
1. Every day it was repeated on cue. Everywhere & especially, RIGHT HERE
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 11:46 AM
Apr 2018

Happy yet?

Apologies anyone?

C h.i.r.p.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
2. Many left here
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 11:56 AM
Apr 2018

They went to JPR and who knows where else.

I supported Bernie during the primaries.
My thought was he was less hawkish than her.

As soon as she won the primary I turned my head around (admittedly with the help of others) and got behind her as our candidate.
I was never going to support Dump and always saw him as a clear and present danger.

I did venture over to JPR and was horrified with what I saw.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
3. The DU constantly had thread bashing HRC and that was one of the main
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 11:59 AM
Apr 2018

subjects. I also remember that many said they were voting 3rd party or not at all.

How is that working out for you who claimed harsh talking points from "fake news" and Russia.

mcar

(42,443 posts)
4. They will never apologize, never even walk it back
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:04 PM
Apr 2018

But we've got to reach out to them so they will deign to vote Democratic.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
5. This post was written by a 14 yr old boy who just got his first erection.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:05 PM
Apr 2018

Dear god he is a child


HRC may well have done something similar, but the world would know her reasons were serious and not to distract from being a traitor, like rump

procon

(15,805 posts)
7. So the primary reason to have a military force is to give Dear Leader
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:25 PM
Apr 2018

an opportunity to flaunt it's bloated budget and make other countries envious of its ostentatious proportions?

Counting the days until Trump shows up in his new bespoke military costume, resplendent with gold braid, piping and bullion trims, with a satin sash stretched over his paunch. He design the outfit himself, so I'd be disappointed not to see him all beribboned and bedecked with ornate medals and lots of flashy bejeweled bling and flair, commemorative pins, patches and buttons.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
8. And I would bet that had she ordered the same strikes, you would be falling over yourself
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:37 PM
Apr 2018

to say how strong she was. Just like when Obama did the same thing.

Wrong is wrong. D or R, doesn't matter when the missiles are flying.

philly_bob

(2,419 posts)
10. When we get some distance from the current shitshow,
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:51 PM
Apr 2018

historians can sort out HRC's attitude to military strikes vs. DT's attitude. (Hint: DT's inconsistent, all over the place, ranting.)

During HRC's time in government, I recall that she was allied with those who called for regime change in Syria as a national foreign policy goal, which, to me, is the Original Sin of U.S. Syria policy.

Whatever, I sure wish HRC was president today.

philly_bob

(2,419 posts)
11. Ran across an early reference to Regime Change in Syria, from Bolton.
Mon Apr 16, 2018, 07:05 PM
Apr 2018

From Vox, [link:https://www.vox.com/world/2018/4/16/17242296/us-bombing-syria-trump-bolton|

“[Syria] is increasingly an Iranian satellite under Tehran’s growing regional influence,” Bolton wrote in a 2012 National Review article, near the beginning of the civil war. “Accordingly, regime change in Syria is prima facie in America’s interest.”

Bolton uses "prima facie" from law here. It means "based on the first impression; accepted as correct until proved otherwise."

philly_bob

(2,419 posts)
12. Other 2012 reference to Regime Change in Syria:
Mon Apr 16, 2018, 08:27 PM
Apr 2018

From think-tank Brookings:
[link:http://www.brookings.edu/research/saving-syria-assessing-options-for-regime-change/|

These are neo-cons, well-known for encouraging the U.S. to intervene in the Middle East, usually in a way that would benefit Israel.

Did Clinton herself support regime change in Iraq? The Google record is unclear, except an article in Foreign Policy magazine that said: "Syria: In 2012, she [Clinton] reportedly proposed to the White House — along with CIA Director David Petraeus — a covert program (apparently larger than the one later authorized) to provide arms to vetted Syrian rebel groups fighting Bashar al-Assad’s government. " [Obama vetoed it.]

This is not definitive proof. She was nowhere near as warlike as Bolton.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I recall many who claimed...