Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Assad has used conventional weapons for years to kill his people (Original Post) SHRED Apr 2018 OP
Not that 40 people dead is trivial, but compared to tens of thousands dead and maimed? kysrsoze Apr 2018 #1
Exactly SHRED Apr 2018 #2
He should have followed Obamas lead and not launched missiles. David__77 Apr 2018 #4
It is not OK. janx Apr 2018 #3
Guessing Trump has arms and chemical co. ties torius Apr 2018 #5
If you actually think about it for a second, all weapons are 'chemical' weapons ... mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #6

kysrsoze

(6,025 posts)
1. Not that 40 people dead is trivial, but compared to tens of thousands dead and maimed?
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:13 AM
Apr 2018

Assad has been destroying entire neighborhoods, bombing hospitals, etc. This whole supposed moral response is a distraction and nothing more. If he gave a shit about Syrians, pResident Fuckface would have done far more about all the other attrocities Assad and his regime have committed.

David__77

(23,603 posts)
4. He should have followed Obamas lead and not launched missiles.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:25 AM
Apr 2018

I am thankful that Obama resisted the calls for war.

janx

(24,128 posts)
3. It is not OK.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:17 AM
Apr 2018

But this is not Trump's decision, because he has no idea of what is going on. Our security and military do, thank dog.

Ironic, isn't it?

torius

(1,652 posts)
5. Guessing Trump has arms and chemical co. ties
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 02:04 AM
Apr 2018

and is monetizing this strike somehow. Because he has not cared about the hundreds of thousands of victims of this war or any of the refugees from Syria, instead his son is out there comparing them to Skittles.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
6. If you actually think about it for a second, all weapons are 'chemical' weapons ...
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 05:01 AM
Apr 2018

What the hell do people think 'bombs' ... are?

Even bullets, which essentially do 'physical damage' ... are actually propelled from the guns they emerge from ... via chemical reactions.

Imagining that it's truly more horrific to be subjected to poison gas or whatnot vs. explosions and their attendant fires (also 'chemical' in nature) is pretty nonsensical to me.

The reason 'chemical weapons' are 'banned' and physical/explosive ones are not probably has a lot more to do with the fact chemical weapons are dirt fucking cheap and don't require large corporations to produce them at great taxpayer expense, enriching a bunch of board members and stock-holders ... instead of basically nobody. Killing a bunch of enemy forces without enriching Corporations just wouldn't be 'right', somehow, you know?

BTW, how come when we execute people on death row, we administer what are essentially chemical weapons (poisons) and call it the 'humane' way to end their lives ... rather than just chuck a bunch of grenades at them? Hmmmm?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Assad has used convention...