Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMitt’s Insults, Mistakes, and Blunders Abroad aren’t Gaffes. They Represent his True Worldview
The thing that Krauthammer doesnt get is that Romney is not the sort of businessmanthat his brand of capitalism is not the sort of enterprisethat requires even the most elementary understanding of diplomacy, courtesy, or sensitivity to other peoples values, lives, or perceptions.
The American capitalists-turned-statesmen of an earlier generationDouglas Dillon, Averell Harriman, Robert Lovett, John McCloy, Dean Acheson, Paul Nitzetook risks, built institutions, helped rebuild postwar Europe, befriended their foreign counterparts: in short, they cultivated an internationalist sensibility at their core. Whatever you think of their politics or Cold War policies generally (and there is much to criticize), financiers formed an American political elite in that era because finance (through the Marshall Plan, the World Bank, the IMF, and so forth) was so often the vehicle of American expansionism.
By contrast, private-equity firms, such as Bain Capital, where Romney made his fortune, tend to view their client companies as cash cows, susceptible to cookie-cutter formulas from which the firms partners reap lavish fees, almost regardless of the outcome. Their ends and means breed an insularity, a sense of entitlement, a disposition to view all the worlds entities through a single prism and to appraise them along a single scale.
How Romney should have behaved in London may have been obvious to Charles Krauthammer, who studies politics; it would have been obvious to politically ambitious businessmen from more traditional lines of work or from an earlier era. But as we have been graced to see this week, it is not necessarily obvious to Romney himself.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2012/07/mitt_romney_s_insults_and_mistakes_while_at_the_london_olympics_aren_t_gaffes_as_much_as_a_fair_representation_of_his_worldview_.html
The American capitalists-turned-statesmen of an earlier generationDouglas Dillon, Averell Harriman, Robert Lovett, John McCloy, Dean Acheson, Paul Nitzetook risks, built institutions, helped rebuild postwar Europe, befriended their foreign counterparts: in short, they cultivated an internationalist sensibility at their core. Whatever you think of their politics or Cold War policies generally (and there is much to criticize), financiers formed an American political elite in that era because finance (through the Marshall Plan, the World Bank, the IMF, and so forth) was so often the vehicle of American expansionism.
By contrast, private-equity firms, such as Bain Capital, where Romney made his fortune, tend to view their client companies as cash cows, susceptible to cookie-cutter formulas from which the firms partners reap lavish fees, almost regardless of the outcome. Their ends and means breed an insularity, a sense of entitlement, a disposition to view all the worlds entities through a single prism and to appraise them along a single scale.
How Romney should have behaved in London may have been obvious to Charles Krauthammer, who studies politics; it would have been obvious to politically ambitious businessmen from more traditional lines of work or from an earlier era. But as we have been graced to see this week, it is not necessarily obvious to Romney himself.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2012/07/mitt_romney_s_insults_and_mistakes_while_at_the_london_olympics_aren_t_gaffes_as_much_as_a_fair_representation_of_his_worldview_.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1171 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt’s Insults, Mistakes, and Blunders Abroad aren’t Gaffes. They Represent his True Worldview (Original Post)
phantom power
Jul 2012
OP
liberal N proud
(60,349 posts)1. It is sad but true.
Poiuyt
(18,131 posts)2. I assumed he was pandering to his jingoistic base
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)3. I've been saying all along
That Rmoney's unique business experience is the complete opposite of what a President should be. A President nutures and cares for their country, at Bain you only cared about the money.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)5. +1,000
Focusing your life solely on making a buck shows a certain poverty of ambition. It asks too little of yourself. Because it's only when you hitch your wagon to something larger than yourself that you realize your true potential. ~ Barack Obama
I've always felt this way. Mitt might be pitied for having given up his humanity, but he's become a danger to the rest of us.
I've always felt this way. Mitt might be pitied for having given up his humanity, but he's become a danger to the rest of us.
indepat
(20,899 posts)4. Spot-on analysis of der Mittens'
worldview: he doesn't know better and doesn't care imo, for he intends to cram his worldview in our faces.