does Mueller have contact with Sessions, Rosenstein,on daily or weekly bases?

[bluestarone]

and why can't Mueller question tRump under oath? (been a year now) and he's not question tRump, can't get perjury if you don't question. I guess i'm somewhat anxious?

[Eliot Rosewater]

1. He wouldnt question the suspect under oath, he would gather evidence, indict, then in court

question him. (I am not a lawyer but assume that is how it goes)

The people who were caught lying to the FBI when questioned were probably not targets or suspects.

And since the traitor has the ability to pardon, who knows what will happen.

[bluestarone]

3. your right i guess and after thinking more about it i think maybe perjury is

The least charge they are looking at for tRump? i don't know. They want the BIG CHARGE against him. (I'm hoping)

[KPN]

8. Didn't Starr question Bill Clinton under oath in the Whitewater/Lewinsky investigation?

If he could, seems like Mueller should also be able to do that.

Clinton was also testified under oath when before the Grand Jury regarding the Lewinsky scandal. Would that not have been before charges were brought as well?

[burnbaby]

9. Clinton was under oath

remember the "that depends on what the meaning of "is" is

[Eliot Rosewater]

10. That was a civil case

[burnbaby]

11. are you sure?

I thought it was Starr and gang when they charged him with getting a BJ

[Eliot Rosewater]

12. Someone mentioned the "is" thing, and that was a civil case, of that I am sure.

Starr was something else, the big investigation

What happened was for the first time EVER a sitting president was allowed to be sued, civilly, while in office

[burnbaby]

13. thanks nt

[marylandblue]

2. Putting a President under oath is politically sensitive and legally challenging

It would tie his investigation in knots and open him up to political attacks. Better to indict first and then let it play out in court.

[bluestarone]

4. Gotcha TY

[bluestarone]

16. just wondering do you have thoughts on if Nunes is

meeting with Rosenstein?

[marylandblue]

17. I don't know, but

probably not. They don't have anything to talk about.

[emulatorloo]

5. Sessions has recused himself from Trump-Russia. So Mueller would not be meeting w Sessions

[bluestarone]

6. you think he meets with Rosenstein? and

is Rosenstein trustworthy? ( i mean do you think he's talking at all with tRump) after talking with Mueller?

[emulatorloo]

7. Rosenstein seems very solid to me.

Which is probably why Trump is so angry at Sessions

[Bradical79]

14. Personally, I think Rossenstein is just being rational

I think he recognizes how corrupt Trump is and knows he doesn't want to get caught on the wrong side of the bullshit surrounding this in the future. He's got nothing to gain right now by being Trump's tool. He isn't a lawmaker worrying about electoral politics, isn't part of the Russian conspiracy, and has a career to protect while knowing Trump is only temporary.

[bluestarone]

15. that sounds very logical!!

He does have a lot to lose for sure!!!