HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » does Mueller have contact...

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:24 PM

does Mueller have contact with Sessions, Rosenstein,on daily or weekly bases?

and why can't Mueller question tRump under oath? (been a year now) and he's not question tRump, can't get perjury if you don't question. I guess i'm somewhat anxious?

17 replies, 842 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 17 replies Author Time Post
Reply does Mueller have contact with Sessions, Rosenstein,on daily or weekly bases? (Original post)
bluestarone Jan 2018 OP
Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #1
bluestarone Jan 2018 #3
KPN Jan 2018 #8
burnbaby Jan 2018 #9
Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #10
burnbaby Jan 2018 #11
Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #12
burnbaby Jan 2018 #13
marylandblue Jan 2018 #2
bluestarone Jan 2018 #4
bluestarone Jan 2018 #16
marylandblue Jan 2018 #17
emulatorloo Jan 2018 #5
bluestarone Jan 2018 #6
emulatorloo Jan 2018 #7
Bradical79 Jan 2018 #14
bluestarone Jan 2018 #15

Response to bluestarone (Original post)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:29 PM

1. He wouldnt question the suspect under oath, he would gather evidence, indict, then in court

question him. (I am not a lawyer but assume that is how it goes)

The people who were caught lying to the FBI when questioned were probably not targets or suspects.

And since the traitor has the ability to pardon, who knows what will happen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:34 PM

3. your right i guess and after thinking more about it i think maybe perjury is

The least charge they are looking at for tRump? i don't know. They want the BIG CHARGE against him. (I'm hoping)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:51 PM

8. Didn't Starr question Bill Clinton under oath in the Whitewater/Lewinsky investigation?

If he could, seems like Mueller should also be able to do that.

Clinton was also testified under oath when before the Grand Jury regarding the Lewinsky scandal. Would that not have been before charges were brought as well?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:51 PM

9. Clinton was under oath

 

remember the "that depends on what the meaning of "is" is

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to burnbaby (Reply #9)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:53 PM

10. That was a civil case

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:59 PM

11. are you sure?

 

I thought it was Starr and gang when they charged him with getting a BJ

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to burnbaby (Reply #11)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 02:04 PM

12. Someone mentioned the "is" thing, and that was a civil case, of that I am sure.

Starr was something else, the big investigation

What happened was for the first time EVER a sitting president was allowed to be sued, civilly, while in office

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #12)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 02:13 PM

13. thanks nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestarone (Original post)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:32 PM

2. Putting a President under oath is politically sensitive and legally challenging

It would tie his investigation in knots and open him up to political attacks. Better to indict first and then let it play out in court.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marylandblue (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:35 PM

4. Gotcha TY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marylandblue (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 02:30 PM

16. just wondering do you have thoughts on if Nunes is

meeting with Rosenstein?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestarone (Reply #16)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 02:39 PM

17. I don't know, but

probably not. They don't have anything to talk about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestarone (Original post)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:39 PM

5. Sessions has recused himself from Trump-Russia. So Mueller would not be meeting w Sessions

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to emulatorloo (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:43 PM

6. you think he meets with Rosenstein? and

is Rosenstein trustworthy? ( i mean do you think he's talking at all with tRump) after talking with Mueller?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestarone (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:44 PM

7. Rosenstein seems very solid to me.

Which is probably why Trump is so angry at Sessions

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestarone (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 02:18 PM

14. Personally, I think Rossenstein is just being rational

 

I think he recognizes how corrupt Trump is and knows he doesn't want to get caught on the wrong side of the bullshit surrounding this in the future. He's got nothing to gain right now by being Trump's tool. He isn't a lawmaker worrying about electoral politics, isn't part of the Russian conspiracy, and has a career to protect while knowing Trump is only temporary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bradical79 (Reply #14)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 02:22 PM

15. that sounds very logical!!

He does have a lot to lose for sure!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread