General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Snotty and condescending." WA Post's energetic slap down of sexist, anti-HRC Vanity Fair video
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/12/27/vanity-fair-staffers-provide-snotty-condescending-life-tips-for-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.05177f4cefa5By Erik Wemple
How do you boost Hillary Clintons favorability ratings with Trumpites? Thats a tough task, considering the enduring popularity of the whole lock her up movement. Yet one approach would be to line up a crew of young urbanites, put champagne flutes in their hands and have them recite snarky and demeaning New Years resolutions for the twice-failed presidential candidate and former first lady.
SNIP
The presentation reaches peak condescension, with this resolution: Take up a new hobby in the new year: Volunteer work, knitting, improv comedy, literally anything that will keep you from running again. The tweeted response of @shuboogie pretty much summed up the social-media backlash: Furious they could gleefully humiliate a woman who fought so hard in a male world & worked for so much progress for the vulnerable: & condescending suggestion she take up knitting .. as if thats what women should be doing instead of giving their lives to politics & causes. Others pointed out that Clinton was the first woman to secure the presidential nomination of a major U.S. political party.
Perhaps Vanity Fairs satire would have a comedic toehold if Clinton were ramping up for yet another presidential run. Instead, she has issued an airtight statement: No, Im not going to run again. That said, she has declared that shell stay active in politics and in the spring launched a group to advance the resistance to President Trump and his allies in Congress:
The cynical politics of Trump and his followers have managed to raise Clintons contemporary profile far beyond what would be expected from a failed presidential candidate who had disavowed future political campaigns. And thats, in part, what makes this treatment so irksome: Create your own stupid political narrative, Vanity Fair!
SNIP
dalton99a
(81,648 posts)Cha
(297,831 posts)I can't read the rest to know who wrote it at WaPo.. but I thank them!
And, Mahalo to you, pnwmom!
pnwmom
(109,015 posts)Cha
(297,831 posts)And, thanks to, Erik Wemple!
joshcryer
(62,279 posts)Who even thought that was funny? It's highly unlikely she runs again after losing to literally the freest win possible. It's a shame, too, because I think she should. It wouldn't be hard to pull a populist approach. She could really go firebrand and make it about impeaching Trump, but it would take 3 years of trying, and I doubt she has it in her.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)their Rag.
ProfessorGAC
(65,279 posts)It's supposed to be funny. This isn't even slightly humorous. It's just stupid.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,675 posts)The Twitter feed of the article's author:
@ErikWemple
BannonsLiver
(16,530 posts)Also, the irony of new year's resolutions appears to be lost on at least 2 of them. And notice how the comments by the women were more vicious. A couple of real girl's girls there.
dalton99a
(81,648 posts)Submariner
(12,511 posts)LisaM
(27,846 posts)The only one that was remotely related to funny was the first one (which actually looked better live than it did being read), but this was really a uniformly awful attempt at humor.
It was embarrassing to watch people act like that.
irisblue
(33,039 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)These people STILL have no idea where their attitudes come from or why. If awareness breaks in, this suggests it's quickly tamped down.
They're just basking happily in the safe center of their in-crowd, trading in-crowd groupthink.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Clinton won the working class vote. And as a working class American, it makes me ill to see Vanity Fair ushering in the new year insulting our candidate while holding their Champaign glasses. On top of Trump's constant assault on our country, I don't need a bunch of condecending assholes rubbing it in. She was the first major party woman candidate and received millions of more votes in the face of unprecedented foreign interference and Republican colaboration with that foreign power. Not the sort of person deserving of condecention like that.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Already canceled my subscription.
MaryMagdaline
(6,856 posts)You privileged jerk.