Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

garybeck

(9,942 posts)
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 03:53 PM Dec 2017

Just a reminder... both GWB and DJT lost the popular vote.

Perhaps this means...

1) Maybe our country is not as fucked up as we think

2) Maybe a top priority should be to change the electoral college system before we leave this place an empty stone.

You know that saying... three strikes and you're out.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just a reminder... both GWB and DJT lost the popular vote. (Original Post) garybeck Dec 2017 OP
It's already been more than three strikes. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #1
You're going to need one heck of a massive Democratic wave in Congress OliverQ Dec 2017 #2
I don't think the founding fathers lapfog_1 Dec 2017 #3
on the contrary, the founding states were radically different -- slave states vs. free states. unblock Dec 2017 #5
Maybe we should think outside sham election processes ck4829 Dec 2017 #4

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,909 posts)
1. It's already been more than three strikes.
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 03:56 PM
Dec 2017

John Quincy Adams lost the popular vote in 1824, Rutherford Hayes lost it in 1876, and likewise Benjamin Harrison in 1888.

 

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)
2. You're going to need one heck of a massive Democratic wave in Congress
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 03:58 PM
Dec 2017

and every state to ever have a shot at repealing the electoral college. I just don't ever see it happening.

lapfog_1

(29,228 posts)
3. I don't think the founding fathers
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 04:01 PM
Dec 2017

ever envisioned a union of states where

a) people and commerce were as mobile as they are today

(meaning the federal government is much more important today than in the late 1700s).

and

b) There would be such a disparity in the states like California and Wyoming (both in population and economic importance).


Time to rethink the electoral college AND the representation in the Senate (and even the House).


unblock

(52,391 posts)
5. on the contrary, the founding states were radically different -- slave states vs. free states.
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 04:56 PM
Dec 2017

and in fact, the bicameral system, with the senate having equal representation by state, not population; the electoral college system; and the notorious 3/5ths clause were all part of preserving the balance between the very different free states vs. slave states. even the amendment process was made difficult in part due to this.

they knew what they were doing, they were just solving for very different problems with rather different challenges than we are worried about today.

unfortunately, we remain saddled with some of these decisions despite the fact that slavery is no longer legal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just a reminder... both G...