Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
6. oh ok gottcha
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 11:52 AM
Dec 2017

thought you meant election would be tie. Now i see what you said TY. So the Repubs cannot appeal again right?

kentuck

(111,079 posts)
2. I saw a photo of the ballot in question.
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 11:44 AM
Dec 2017

Both names were circled in black.

But Simonds had a line thru it and the Republican did not?

It was first read as a vote for Simonds.

I'm not so sure?

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
4. i thought they DID NOT COUNT THIS BALLOT AT FIRST?
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 11:47 AM
Dec 2017

then decided to count it later causing a tie? (i thought she was leading by 1 vote) Am i wrong?

unblock

(52,196 posts)
9. i think the recount tossed out this ballot, leaving the democrat up by 1 vote.
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:12 PM
Dec 2017

then they refused to certify the election on the grounds that this one ballot should be counted as a vote for the republican, leading to a tied election.

the ballot had both candidates' circles filled in, supporting the argument that it was an invalid overvote.

but the circle for the democrat had a single line through it, supporting the argument that it was "crossed-out" and therefore meant to be a vote for the republican.


i think. i've seen some confusing articles on this matter....

unblock

(52,196 posts)
7. i thought it was more a question of process.
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:04 PM
Dec 2017

however they had counted or not counted that particular ballot, at the stage in question they were only certifying the results, not going through individual ballots. supposedly it wasn't the time or place to challenge individual ballots.

so the question is, was it proper to refuse to certify the results due to a single disputed ballot?

and if so, shouldn't there be a more extensive review (or perhaps i should say, *another* review) of all ballots, rather than just a decision based on a single ballot?

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
8. and my BIGGEST Question was
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:10 PM
Dec 2017

If she wins this appeal, IS IT THE END OF IT? or CAN THEY APPEAL? TY to who can answer this part!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»help me with the process!