Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

traladeda

(48 posts)
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 10:53 AM Dec 2017

Failure to Protect

First, I acknowledge we can sue anyone for anything...but what I've been trying to find out is if there is anything in statute or precedent that could be read or argued as the basis for bringing a lawsuit against the administration for failure to act, nay failure to even TRY to protect the republic against a national security threat?

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Failure to Protect (Original Post) traladeda Dec 2017 OP
Called Timewas Dec 2017 #1

Timewas

(2,196 posts)
1. Called
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:15 PM
Dec 2017

Malfeasance............. noun, Law.
1.
the performance by a public official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing (used especially of an act in violation of a public trust).

Or
nonfeasence: noun, Law.
1.
the omission of some act that ought to have been performed.

Or

misfeasance:

noun, Law.
1.
a wrong, actual or alleged, arising from or consisting of affirmative action.
2.
the wrongful performance of a normally lawful act; the wrongful and injurious exercise of lawful authority.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Failure to Protect