Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SHRED

(28,136 posts) Sat Dec 23, 2017, 02:16 PM Dec 2017

4

Bipartisanship via a Judge's order

Link to tweet

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bipartisanship via a Judge's order (Original Post) SHRED Dec 2017 OP

And they might even defy a court order. They are brazen now and don't even pretend anymore. Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #1

Ya dont say nm AmericanActivist Dec 2017 #2

I know right? SHRED Dec 2017 #3

Man, for cryin out loud this cotton-pickin mess AmericanActivist Dec 2017 #4

The decision will be appealed...n/t bluecollar2 Dec 2017 #5

Irish_Dem

(47,552 posts)

1. And they might even defy a court order. They are brazen now and don't even pretend anymore.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 02:18 PM

Dec 2017

AmericanActivist

(1,019 posts)

2. Ya dont say nm

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 02:18 PM

Dec 2017

SHRED

(28,136 posts)

3. I know right?

Reply to AmericanActivist (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 02:20 PM

Dec 2017

AmericanActivist

(1,019 posts)

4. Man, for cryin out loud this cotton-pickin mess

Reply to SHRED (Reply #3)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 02:33 PM

Dec 2017

Is this the answer for our times? That courts must direct bipartisan inclusion? So surreal.

bluecollar2

(3,622 posts)

5. The decision will be appealed...n/t

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 23, 2017, 02:39 PM

Dec 2017

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bipartisanship via a Judg...